Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Adding Deepseek R1 model #262

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jan 24, 2025
Merged

Adding Deepseek R1 model #262

merged 3 commits into from
Jan 24, 2025

Conversation

Sixzero
Copy link
Collaborator

@Sixzero Sixzero commented Jan 23, 2025

Just added model under aliases and costs.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 23, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 92.06%. Comparing base (2600eb9) to head (31424ed).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #262   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   92.06%   92.06%           
=======================================
  Files          49       49           
  Lines        4799     4799           
=======================================
  Hits         4418     4418           
  Misses        381      381           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@svilupp
Copy link
Owner

svilupp commented Jan 24, 2025

Thanks! Would you mind incrementing the version of PT to 0.70 and adding a quick note in the changelog about these changes? (same for the subsequent PR)

@Sixzero
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Sixzero commented Jan 24, 2025

Added for both, and yeah they are subsequent, I wonder how it will go.

@svilupp svilupp marked this pull request as ready for review January 24, 2025 20:36
@svilupp svilupp merged commit 380d256 into svilupp:main Jan 24, 2025
6 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants