Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[REQUEST] Scanner based Insights #490

Open
fyodorr opened this issue Mar 21, 2025 · 0 comments
Open

[REQUEST] Scanner based Insights #490

fyodorr opened this issue Mar 21, 2025 · 0 comments
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@fyodorr
Copy link

fyodorr commented Mar 21, 2025

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.

It would be nice if we could move the insights that are present available in the UI to each scanner instead. It would be much simpler to maintain and develop a scanner and add the insight for that directly into the scanner. As it is now, the development of a scanner requires both the scanner code and UI change.

Describe the solution you'd like

I propose enhancing the Scanner base class in strelka.py to support scanner-specific insights. Each scanner would maintain its own list of insights about the files it analyses, which would then be automatically included in the scanner's event output. Add an insights list attribute to the scanner base class. Then update the UI to read these insights instead of populating and have the logic for them in the UI.
By moving insights directly into scanners, we leverage the domain expertise of each scanner's code, improve maintainability, and make the system more extensible as new scanners will automatically contribute relevant insights.

Does this sound like something that is doable or am I missing something crucial?

@fyodorr fyodorr added the enhancement New feature or request label Mar 21, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants