You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Copy file name to clipboardExpand all lines: meetings/2025-07/july-28.md
+13-5Lines changed: 13 additions & 5 deletions
Display the source diff
Display the rich diff
Original file line number
Diff line number
Diff line change
@@ -10,7 +10,6 @@ Day One—28 July 2025
10
10
| Dmitry Makhnev | DJM | JetBrains |
11
11
| Waldemar Horwat | WH | Invited Expert |
12
12
| Guy Bedford | GB | Cloudflare |
13
-
| Chris de Almeida | CDA | IBM |
14
13
| Daniel Minor | DLM | Mozilla |
15
14
| Zbyszek Tenerowicz | ZTZ | Consensys |
16
15
| Jordan Harband | JHD | HeroDevs |
@@ -29,8 +28,17 @@ Day One—28 July 2025
29
28
| Tab Atkins-Bittner | TAB | Google |
30
29
| Istvan Sebestyen | IS | Ecma |
31
30
| Daniel Rosenwasser | DRR | Microsoft |
32
-
| Michael Ficarra | MF | F5 |
33
31
| Andreu Botella | ABO | Igalia |
32
+
| Chris de Almeida | CDA | IBM |
33
+
| Chengzhong Wu | CZW | Bloomberg |
34
+
| Justin Ridgewell | JRL | Google |
35
+
| Kevin Gibbons | KG | F5 |
36
+
| Mathieu Hofman | MAH | Agoric |
37
+
| Michael Ficarra | MF | F5 |
38
+
| Mark S. Miller | MM | Agoric |
39
+
| Rob Palmer | RPR | Bloomberg |
40
+
| Stephen Hicks | SHS | Google |
41
+
| Ujjwal Sharma | USA | Igalia |
34
42
35
43
## Opening & Welcome
36
44
@@ -198,7 +206,7 @@ CDA: Okay. I think we formally have to do that through plenary. Right? We’re c
198
206
199
207
RPR: Given this was a surprise, I guess—does—maybe—ask, does anyone want more time to think about whether MF is okay as convenor for this task group? Okay. And, in which case, I think we could probably just go ahead right now and ask for—oh, go ahead. SMH.
200
208
201
-
SMH: Yes, I just want to say, if you have no opposition and if the TG is proposing a convener is accepted by the technical committee as a whole and through the chairs, and you can do in this short notice, you should be fine.
209
+
SHN: Yes, I just want to say, if you have no opposition and if the TG is proposing a convener is accepted by the technical committee as a whole and through the chairs, and you can do in this short notice, you should be fine.
202
210
203
211
CDA: I support plus one for MF for joining the conveners group of TG5.
204
212
@@ -1084,11 +1092,11 @@ MM: Great. Thank you.
1084
1092
1085
1093
CDA: Next?
1086
1094
1087
-
CWU: Yeah. I think this is worth mentioning that the HTML integration is not going to be ended up in the proposal specification text. But I think it is worth to have it together to be reviewed with the proposal spec text together to be advancing to 2.7. Because, I mean, that would helpful to access use cases with the proposal and on the web integration.
1095
+
CZW: Yeah. I think this is worth mentioning that the HTML integration is not going to be ended up in the proposal specification text. But I think it is worth to have it together to be reviewed with the proposal spec text together to be advancing to 2.7. Because, I mean, that would helpful to access use cases with the proposal and on the web integration.
1088
1096
1089
1097
ABO: I guess I should point out, it is possible that the spec has to be updated to add things that the web specs can use from the proposal. It would not be changing any of the behavior in the, on the Ecma-262 side of things. It is just adding algorithms for the web specs.
@@ -463,7 +476,7 @@ RGN: Yeah, I would be happy with that outcome.
463
476
464
477
USA: Okay.
465
478
466
-
JDH (on queue):, plus one for stage three conditional for test approval.
479
+
JHD (on queue):, plus one for stage three conditional for test approval.
467
480
468
481
KM: Yeah, I don’t think we have a problem with stage three, the feedback I got from our DOM folks is that we probably won’t ship until any kinks and everything else, and everything is worked out on the DOM integration side of this. I don’t know fully know what that means in hindsight I should have asked clarification before, but if there is something there from shipping, but we will probably implement the feature before then.
@@ -320,11 +333,11 @@ MM: Can we just ask if there are any objections to stage one?
320
333
321
334
DLM: Fair enough. Any objections to stage one?
322
335
323
-
JLS: Not a strong objection, but I would like to see isolation(?) around the wording of the problem a bit more. It just troubling me that is too kind of open-ended.
336
+
JSL: Not a strong objection, but I would like to see isolation(?) around the wording of the problem a bit more. It just troubling me that is too kind of open-ended.
324
337
325
338
KKL: I agree. Let’s refine that out of band to specifically mean the module map, the specific things we wish to isolate that are not intrinsics.
326
339
327
-
JLS: I just want to be clear, I’m not wording it as an objection for stage one, but if we can get that cleared during the plenary.
340
+
JSL: I just want to be clear, I’m not wording it as an objection for stage one, but if we can get that cleared during the plenary.
328
341
329
342
DLM: Yeah, why don't we come back with a problem statement? We need to move on with the next topic. We will bring the problem statement back and have a discussion later on. I will capture the queue and we can move onto the next topic.
0 commit comments