Skip to content

Remove the per file link check total #395

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
jsoref opened this issue Jan 9, 2025 · 3 comments · May be fixed by #438
Open

Remove the per file link check total #395

jsoref opened this issue Jan 9, 2025 · 3 comments · May be fixed by #438

Comments

@jsoref
Copy link

jsoref commented Jan 9, 2025

Reading the log from [email protected] in https://github.com/check-spelling-sandbox/opentelemetry-collector-contrib/actions/runs/12681692584/job/35345929645 was an adventure...

I'm not really sure that a link check count per file is particularly helpful, so it's probably worth considering omitting that line of output...

Certainly, in this case, that line really didn't add any value:

FILE: receiver/snowflakereceiver/documentation.md
No hyperlinks found!

0 links checked.

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Apr 8, 2025

This issue has been marked as stale because it has been open 60 days with no activity. It will be closed in 30 days unless the stale label is removed or someone adds a comment.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the Stale label Apr 8, 2025
@jsoref
Copy link
Author

jsoref commented Apr 8, 2025

@tcort @WillGibson ?

@WillGibson
Copy link
Collaborator

@jsoref Agreed, that line does not add any value.

I would be open to you submitting a pull request to remove it, but...

Have you tried the --quiet flag?

See Usage.

@jsoref jsoref linked a pull request Apr 8, 2025 that will close this issue
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the Stale label Apr 17, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants