change traditionalSynonymyRelationshipType property

- create GitHub issue (#205)
- create notes, as existing notes were from relationshipType
- make property not required ('required' came from relationshipType as well)

Author: nielsklazenga

docs/tcs-terms.md

@@ -586,19 +586,19 @@ files.
 		</tr>
 		<tr>
 			<td></td>
-			<td><b>required:</b> Yes — <b>repeatable:</b> No</td>
+			<td><b>required:</b> No — <b>repeatable:</b> No</td>
 		</tr>
 		<tr>
 			<td>Definition</td>
 			<td><p>Type of relationship that is used in traditional synonymy, e.g. 'pro parte synonym' or 'misapplication'.</p></td>
 		</tr>
 		<tr>
 			<td>Comments</td>
-			<td><p>This is an IRI term. One should use a value from the TDWG Taxon Concept  Relationship Type Vocabulary. In the case of Taxon Concept Relationships  from traditional synonymy, the <code>relationshipAccordingTo</code> is the same as the  <code>accordingTo</code> of the Taxon Concept that is the <code>subjectTaxonConcept</code>.</p></td>
+			<td><p>This term should be used together with <code>relationshipType</code> (which is required  anyway). Generally, the value of <code>relationshipType</code> will be <code>intersects</code> if  this property is used.</p></td>
 		</tr>
 		<tr>
 			<td>GitHub issue</td>
-			<td>https://github.com/tdwg/tcs2/issues/200</td>
+			<td>https://github.com/tdwg/tcs2/issues/205</td>
 		</tr>
 	</tbody>
 </table>

master/tcs.yaml

@@ -298,16 +298,15 @@
     'pro parte synonym' or 'misapplication'.
   usage: null
   notes: >-
-    This is an IRI term. One should use a value from the TDWG Taxon Concept 
-    Relationship Type Vocabulary. In the case of Taxon Concept Relationships 
-    from traditional synonymy, the `relationshipAccordingTo` is the same as the 
-    `accordingTo` of the Taxon Concept that is the `subjectTaxonConcept`.
+    This term should be used together with `relationshipType` (which is required 
+    anyway). Generally, the value of `relationshipType` will be `intersects` if 
+    this property is used.
   examples: null
   type: http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#Property
   organizedInClass: http://rs.tdwg.org/tcs/terms/TaxonConceptRelationship
   repeatable: No
-  required: Yes
-  github: 200
+  required: No
+  github: 205
 
 
 # class: TaxonName