Skip to content

Peer Review - Referring Back to Requirements #469

@fsolier

Description

@fsolier

Artifact Under Review
VnV Report
Team Number for Team Doing the Review
22
Description of Issue

Great job, your report was very thorough and detailed! The changes from made from obtaining verification data was very clear and I liked the conclusions drawn for Rev 0. One small, minor suggestion to make your report even stronger would be to include how the tests satisfied or didn't satisfy the requirements met at the end of some analysis sections. This would be helpful for the reader to connect back to the requirements and quickly know the purpose of the test, as well as quickly interpret the outcome of each test in regards to the requirements!

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions