You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
As noted in this issue on the TypeNetwork fork, mathematical symbols could use a little bit of alignment (and stroke weight) help. Most egregiously ‘+’ is hitched to a hot air balloon and sailing high, but lots of other minor issues are visible.
SILE Test Code
\begin{document}
\nofolios
\neverindent
\font[family=Raleway,size=32pt]
\begin{raggedright}
\begin{script}
local str = "1×<>+÷−¬=≠±≤≥3"
for _, features in ipairs({ "", "+lnum" }) do
for _, weight in ipairs({100, 200, 300, 400, 500, 600, 700, 800, 900}) do
SILE.call("font", { weight = weight, features = features }, function ()
SILE.typesetter:typeset(str)
SILE.call("hfill")
SILE.call("font", { style = "Italic" }, { str })
SILE.call("break")
end)
end
end
\end{script}
\end{raggedright}
\end{document}
(Shown with +onum and +lnum.)
CC: @thlinard who seems to be on a crusade on this topic 😉
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
As noted in this issue on the TypeNetwork fork, mathematical symbols could use a little bit of alignment (and stroke weight) help. Most egregiously ‘+’ is hitched to a hot air balloon and sailing high, but lots of other minor issues are visible.
SILE Test Code
(Shown with
+onum
and+lnum
.)CC: @thlinard who seems to be on a crusade on this topic 😉
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: