Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Feature Request] Supporting Access token based authentication in TBMQ #196

Open
gaurav36 opened this issue Feb 10, 2025 · 1 comment
Open
Assignees
Labels
Enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@gaurav36
Copy link

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Currently in TBMQ, it supports only username/password, SSL, and SCRAM-based authentication, but access token-based authentication is still not supported. In my application, I have a use case where I mostly use access tokens. Things board also support it https://thingsboard.io/docs/user-guide/access-token/

Describe the solution you'd like
I would like TBMQ to support access token-based authentication. This would allow my application to authenticate using access tokens, which is more aligned with my current use case and security requirements.

Describe alternatives you've considered
username/password, SSL, and SCRAM-based authentication methods. However, these methods do not fit well with my application’s architecture and security model, which relies heavily on access tokens.

Additional context
Adding support for access token-based authentication would enhance the flexibility and security of TBMQ, making it more versatile for various applications.

@gaurav36 gaurav36 added the Enhancement New feature or request label Feb 10, 2025
@dmytro-landiak
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @gaurav36,

Thank you for providing the detailed information about the feature request. We will review it and get back to you once we have a plan in place.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants