Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Is it possible to train the DispNet alone? #105

Open
sanweiliti opened this issue Dec 16, 2018 · 2 comments
Open

Is it possible to train the DispNet alone? #105

sanweiliti opened this issue Dec 16, 2018 · 2 comments

Comments

@sanweiliti
Copy link

Hi,
Since the depth net and pose net are trained jointly, they must benefit from each other. Is it possible to only train the DispNet alone as a supervised problem without using pose information? I understand that one of the highlights of your paper is to use unsupervised learning, but I'm curious is it reasonable to train the DispNet alone in a supervised framework? I'm studying different depth estimation network structures, and it will be more fair to compare all structures in a similiar supervised framework. Thank you!

@bachw433
Copy link

hi sanweiliti,
you can check this paper:
https://arxiv.org/abs/1512.02134
dispNET comes from there and it was a supervised model.
(actually, all the model can be either supervised or unsupervised only depends on your loss fucntion)

and BTW, I'm interesting in your study. Which network is the best one so far XD?

@sanweiliti
Copy link
Author

Hi @bachw433
Thanks! I will try to modify it. My study focuses more on relationships between depth estimation networks and segmentation networks so I can't really say which model is the best.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants