Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

To resolve before first release #2

Open
fosterlynn opened this issue Dec 11, 2017 · 2 comments
Open

To resolve before first release #2

fosterlynn opened this issue Dec 11, 2017 · 2 comments

Comments

@fosterlynn
Copy link

Before releasing the alpha to a few key users, here are some minor things I think we need to fix. I'll start with some name display items. Note there are methods that exist in the models that are not exposed on the UI. We could expose them on the UI, or the UI can build its own.

Plan text and Commitment text need to be built if there is not a name or description entered in the data. The first screen is an example of missing plan names.
kanban-plans

The next screen is an example of missing commitment descriptions.
kanban-bad

The next screen is an example of good names/descriptions because they were entered into the base data. This one is good because it was created from a recipe. If they don't look like this, I think we need to create something ourselves.
kanban-good

The next screen is an example of created commitment names. It would be good to have this info plus the description.
commit-name

The next screen is an example of created plan names. It is not so good, but at least better than just the id. (The work app in OCP doesn't really give a way to create a plan name in the planning without recipe function. So it isn't helping. In this case, we could take the process name and put it into the plan.)
plan-name

@bhaugen
Copy link

bhaugen commented Dec 11, 2017

The 4th screenshot (CE Area Facilitation) shows some awkward computed names (duplicated due dates). We can do better. Same for the plans.

@fosterlynn
Copy link
Author

The 4th screenshot (CE Area Facilitation) shows some awkward computed names (duplicated due dates). We can do better. Same for the plans.

Ha it certainly does. That's probably in the UI, not the model method though.

I'll create some displayText properties for Plan and Commitment for the UI.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants