You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Thanks for your impressive work and the open source code @Jevin754.
I am a little confused with the C3D features you provided in google/baidu drive. Its filename is "c3d_res_phoenix_body_iter5_120k.tar.gz" in google drive. Thus, is the feature extracted after 5 iterations of training(trained with pseudo-labels in your paper)?
I implement with your provided training scripts and C3D features. But I get worse results, "[Relaxation Evaluation] Epoch: 50, DEV WER: 40.3". Therefore, I feel puzzled about this C3D feature, do I need to implement alignment and iterative training by myself?
Hope for your reply.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I find out where the problem is. The results of ctcdecoder executed on GPU and CPU are quite different. I changed the calculation of ctc_loss on cpu, and get desired result.
Thanks for your impressive work and the open source code @Jevin754.
I am a little confused with the C3D features you provided in google/baidu drive. Its filename is "c3d_res_phoenix_body_iter5_120k.tar.gz" in google drive. Thus, is the feature extracted after 5 iterations of training(trained with pseudo-labels in your paper)?
I implement with your provided training scripts and C3D features. But I get worse results, "[Relaxation Evaluation] Epoch: 50, DEV WER: 40.3". Therefore, I feel puzzled about this C3D feature, do I need to implement alignment and iterative training by myself?
Hope for your reply.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: