error C2371: “IDispatchEx”: 重定义；不同的基类型

[GoogleCodeExporter]

1>f:\duilib\duilib\Control/UIFlash.h(10): warning C4192: 
导入类型库“IServiceProvider”时自动排除“..\Utils/Flash11.tlb”
1>  UIWebBrowser.cpp
1>c:\program files (x86)\microsoft sdks\windows\v7.0a\include\dispex.h(217): 
error C2371: “IDispatchEx”: 重定义；不同的基类型
1>          c:\program files (x86)\microsoft 
sdks\windows\v7.0a\include\dispex.h(53) : 参见“IDispatchEx”的声明
1>c:\program files (x86)\microsoft sdks\windows\v7.0a\include\dispex.h(435): 
error C2872: “IDispatchEx”: 不明确的符号
1>          可能是“c:\program files (x86)\microsoft 
sdks\windows\v7.0a\include\dispex.h(217) : IDispatchEx”
1>          或       “f:\duilib\duilib\build\debug\flash11.tlh(297) : 
ShockwaveFlashObjects::IDispatchEx”
1>c:\program files (x86)\microsoft sdks\windows\v7.0a\include\dispex.h(869): 
error C2872: “IDispatchEx”: 不明确的符号
1>          可能是“c:\program files (x86)\microsoft 
sdks\windows\v7.0a\include\dispex.h(217) : IDispatchEx”
1>          或       “f:\duilib\duilib\build\debug\flash11.tlh(297) : 
ShockwaveFlashObjects::IDispatchEx”
1>c:\program files (x86)\microsoft sdks\windows\v7.0a\include\dispex.h(887): 
error C2872: “IDispatchEx”: 不明确的符号
1>          可能是“c:\program files (x86)\microsoft 
sdks\windows\v7.0a\include\dispex.h(217) : IDispatchEx”
1>          或       “f:\duilib\duilib\build\debug\flash11.tlh(297) : 
ShockwaveFlashObjects::IDispatchEx”
1>C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft SDKs\Windows\v7.0A\include\mshtml.h(4715): 
error C2872: “IDispatchEx”: 不明确的符号
1>          可能是“c:\program files (x86)\microsoft 
sdks\windows\v7.0a\include\dispex.h(217) : IDispatchEx”
1>          或       “f:\duilib\duilib\build\debug\flash11.tlh(297) : 
ShockwaveFlashObjects::IDispatchEx”
1>C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft SDKs\Windows\v7.0A\include\mshtml.h(4738): 
error C2872: “IDispatchEx”: 不明确的符号
1>          可能是“c:\program files (x86)\microsoft 
sdks\windows\v7.0a\include\dispex.h(217) : IDispatchEx”
1>          或       “f:\duilib\duilib\build\debug\flash11.tlh(297) : 
ShockwaveFlashObjects::IDispatchEx”

Original issue reported on code.google.com by [email protected] on 4 Nov 2013 at 2:53