Replies: 1 comment
-
Hi @Roy-Kid -- Looking at the xtensor-python repo, the amount of effort needed to expose this library is much greater than the relatively smallEigen bindings (which are furthermore relatively static, Eigen is not changing much anymore API-wise). I think it would be better to maintain this as a separate repository. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Dear Wenzel and team,
I would like to contribute an xtensor binding for nanobind. There is already a working implementation using pybind11 here: xtensor-python.
Do you think it would be more appropriate to contribute this to nanobind directly (as was done with Eigen), or should it be part of the xtensor-python repository?
Best regards,
Jichen
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions