Replies: 2 comments 3 replies
-
Thanks for reaching out! I personally find some of the ongoing efforts to simplify the CPython API a little misguided (especially when it comes to functions always returning strong references). I have added some feedback to the form to clarify what I mean by this. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
3 replies
-
For anyone following along, there is now a wider effort for mapping out C API issues at: https://github.com/capi-workgroup/problems/issues |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Hello,
I'm figuring out a strategy for the future of Python's C-API, and as one of the goals I'd like to make it friendly for non-C languages. But since I mostly deal with C & Python, I'd like to ask you for any suggestions, pain points or comments on how do better to that.
Would you like to help?
I started a Google doc to collect notes, please feel free to comment there, or here, or suggest a better place.
Would it be better to ask one of nanobind's predecessors?
Thank you for your time!
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions