Thank you to the authors for their excellent work. I have a question regarding the data.
From my understanding, the 66 dimensions in the dir data represent the positions and delta positions of 10 players + ball, each with (x, y, z) coordinates. While this seems to hold true for the y and z dimensions, it doesn't appear to be the case for the x dimension. Specifically, for example, dims 0-2 correspond to the x, y, and z coordinates of the first player, dim 4 is the delta y between two timesteps, and dim 5 is the delta z. However, I’m unclear about the meaning of dim 3. I initially assumed it to represent the delta x, but that doesn't seem to align with the data. Could you clarify what dim 3 actually represents?
The following figure is an example.
Looking forward to your reply!
Thank you to the authors for their excellent work. I have a question regarding the data.
From my understanding, the 66 dimensions in the dir data represent the positions and delta positions of 10 players + ball, each with (x, y, z) coordinates. While this seems to hold true for the y and z dimensions, it doesn't appear to be the case for the x dimension. Specifically, for example, dims 0-2 correspond to the x, y, and z coordinates of the first player, dim 4 is the delta y between two timesteps, and dim 5 is the delta z. However, I’m unclear about the meaning of dim 3. I initially assumed it to represent the delta x, but that doesn't seem to align with the data. Could you clarify what dim 3 actually represents?
The following figure is an example.
Looking forward to your reply!