Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Discoverable client does not accept JWT from a websocket request #4018

Open
Shobhajayanna opened this issue Mar 3, 2025 · 2 comments
Open

Discoverable client does not accept JWT from a websocket request #4018

Shobhajayanna opened this issue Mar 3, 2025 · 2 comments
Labels
bug Verified defect in functionality Priority: Low size/S

Comments

@Shobhajayanna
Copy link
Contributor

Describe the bug
Discoverable client does not accept JWT from a websocket request, it rejects JWT and returns 401 unauthorized status code.

Steps to Reproduce

  1. Try to make a web socket request with a valid JWT

Expected behavior

It accepts JWT and process the request

Details

  • Version : V3
@Shobhajayanna Shobhajayanna added bug Verified defect in functionality new New issue that has not been worked on yet labels Mar 3, 2025
@balhar-jakub
Copy link
Member

Is the issue general with the websocket implementation or is this issue only within the discoverable client implementation of websocket?

@Shobhajayanna
Copy link
Contributor Author

the issue is only with the discoverable client implementation of websocket.

@EvaJavornicka EvaJavornicka added Priority: Low size/S and removed new New issue that has not been worked on yet labels Mar 5, 2025
@EvaJavornicka EvaJavornicka moved this from New to Unplanned Bugs in API Mediation Layer Backlog Management Mar 5, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
bug Verified defect in functionality Priority: Low size/S
Projects
API Mediation Layer Backlog Management
Status: Unplanned Bugs
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@balhar-jakub @Shobhajayanna @EvaJavornicka