Skip to content

Conversation

@artwyman
Copy link
Collaborator

Closes #420

Also added tests to exercise null and empty-dict and show that they behave the same.

Two points on which I invite discussion:

  • Naming of the literal value
  • Whether the real (non-mock) POD test is worth the extra run-time.

@artwyman artwyman requested review from ed255 and robknight September 11, 2025 05:03
@artwyman artwyman self-assigned this Sep 11, 2025
@artwyman artwyman added the enhancement New feature or request label Sep 11, 2025
pod.verify()?;

// The exact_match_pod() search doesn't know about syntactic sugar
// statements, so we need to use Container* not Dict*.
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This will be fixed by #380 (right now there's no way to communicate the original code along with a MainPod, just the lowered representation).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

enhancement New feature or request

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Explicit empty value literal

3 participants