Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: add remote block prover as optional #719

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: santiagopittella-use-remote-batch-prover
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

SantiagoPittella
Copy link
Collaborator

Closes #717

@SantiagoPittella SantiagoPittella force-pushed the santiagopittella-use-remote-block-prover branch from 7b5d726 to 2d25220 Compare February 24, 2025 21:15
Copy link
Contributor

@Mirko-von-Leipzig Mirko-von-Leipzig left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code looks good to me thanks.

@SantiagoPittella SantiagoPittella force-pushed the santiagopittella-use-remote-batch-prover branch from 99be9e4 to c0e0b04 Compare February 25, 2025 15:18
@SantiagoPittella SantiagoPittella force-pushed the santiagopittella-use-remote-block-prover branch from baf3f44 to 3fdeddb Compare February 25, 2025 15:51
@SantiagoPittella SantiagoPittella force-pushed the santiagopittella-use-remote-batch-prover branch from c0e0b04 to 7b80750 Compare February 25, 2025 18:22
@SantiagoPittella SantiagoPittella force-pushed the santiagopittella-use-remote-block-prover branch from 3fdeddb to dcb309a Compare February 25, 2025 19:02
docs: add changelog entry

docs: update readme

fix: make it compatible with miden-base
@SantiagoPittella SantiagoPittella force-pushed the santiagopittella-use-remote-block-prover branch from dcb309a to 613b842 Compare February 25, 2025 19:09
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants