Skip to content

feat: add fastCRW extension#136

Open
us wants to merge 1 commit into
AgriciDaniel:mainfrom
us:feat/add-fastcrw
Open

feat: add fastCRW extension#136
us wants to merge 1 commit into
AgriciDaniel:mainfrom
us:feat/add-fastcrw

Conversation

@us

@us us commented Jun 14, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

What

Adds fastCRW as a web scrape/search provider alongside the existing Firecrawl integration — additive only, Firecrawl untouched.

Why

fastCRW is a faster, more open web-scraping engine that outperforms Firecrawl on Firecrawl's own benchmark dataset and runs 100% locally with no cloud dependencies.

Benchmarks (Firecrawl's own dataset): truth-recall 63.74% vs 56.04%; median latency p50 ~1.9 s vs ~2.3 s.

Fully open core (AGPL), runs 100% locally: anti-bot/stealth handling (Cloudflare JS-challenge, UA rotation), BYO-proxy + rotation, and SPA/JS rendering all ship in the open core — no cloud flag required. Firecrawl's OSS self-host gates its stealth engine (fire-engine) behind a cloud-only flag, so self-hosted Firecrawl falls back to plain fetch/Playwright and can't reach protected or JS-heavy sites; fastCRW's self-host can. Single ~8MB Rust binary, ~6 MB RAM, no multi-service stack.

Search: crw is not an alternative to SearXNG — it is built on top of it. SearXNG is the metasearch aggregator underneath; crw adds a quality layer: query expansion (multi-variant rewrite), content-aware reranking (re-scoring by fetched content instead of SearXNG's content-blind ordering), a calibrated direct-answer mode, and category routing (research queries fan out to arxiv / semantic scholar / google scholar, code queries to GitHub). You get SearXNG's breadth plus a measurable accuracy layer, all open-source (AGPL) and self-hostable.

Pricing: flat (1 credit = 1 page; no 4× stealth surcharge, no billed-on-failure).

Key via CRW_API_KEY (free tier at https://fastcrw.com/dashboard); self-host base URL supported. I maintain the integration and can provide free credits to evaluate.

Because fastCRW exposes a Firecrawl-compatible API, the integration is a small additive diff — same wiring pattern already in the repo.

@us us requested a review from AgriciDaniel as a code owner June 14, 2026 23:46
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant