Skip to content

Comments

[PWGLF] StraTOF: Addition of hasTOF functionality, remove ITS requirement#13685

Merged
romainschotter merged 2 commits intoAliceO2Group:masterfrom
ddobrigk:dev40
Nov 5, 2025
Merged

[PWGLF] StraTOF: Addition of hasTOF functionality, remove ITS requirement#13685
romainschotter merged 2 commits intoAliceO2Group:masterfrom
ddobrigk:dev40

Conversation

@ddobrigk
Copy link
Collaborator

@ddobrigk ddobrigk commented Nov 4, 2025

This PR:

  • adds getters for hasTOF functionality (positiveHasTOF, negativeHasTOF, bachelorHasTOF). These are necessary as a simple track.hasTOF() won't match the conditionals necessary for strangeness TOF (notably, reassociation requires that the collision time for the new collision be defined, which may not always be the case)
  • removes the hasITS requirement for daughter prongs for strangeness TOF calculation that was a leftover from development, which will result in assignment of strangeness TOF info also to TPCTRD and TPCTOF tracks.
  • Fixes a minor issue in which a histogram was filled without checking if doQA was enabled. This is necessary to ensure that, whenever strangeness-tof-pid is used solely to calculate Nsigmas, unnecessary histograms are not put in memory.

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Nov 4, 2025

O2 linter results: ❌ 54 errors, ⚠️ 47 warnings, 🔕 0 disabled

@romainschotter romainschotter enabled auto-merge (squash) November 4, 2025 16:23
@romainschotter romainschotter merged commit 92b0296 into AliceO2Group:master Nov 5, 2025
17 of 19 checks passed
@ddobrigk ddobrigk deleted the dev40 branch November 5, 2025 20:57
MattOckleton pushed a commit to MattOckleton/O2Physics that referenced this pull request Jan 14, 2026
mapalhares pushed a commit to mapalhares/O2Physics that referenced this pull request Jan 20, 2026
fcolamar pushed a commit to fcolamar/O2Physics that referenced this pull request Feb 4, 2026
karlazertova pushed a commit to karlazertova/O2Physics that referenced this pull request Feb 5, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants