Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add --framework_name option #21

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Conversation

dave-re
Copy link
Contributor

@dave-re dave-re commented Nov 25, 2015

No description provided.

@@ -10,6 +10,7 @@ marathon_apt_repo: "deb http://repos.mesosphere.com/{{ansible_distribution|lower
marathon_yum_package: "marathon-{{ marathon_version }}"
mesosphere_yum_repo: "http://repos.mesosphere.com/el/{{ os_version_major }}/noarch/RPMS/{{ mesosphere_releases[os_version_major] }}"

marathon_framework_name: marathon
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Could you please use the default value used by Marathon, which is marathon-VERSION where version is version of marathon of course.

@ninthnails
Copy link
Contributor

Build is failing if you haven't noticed. Once fixed, we can go ahead merging.

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
---
marathon_playbook_version: "0.3.2"
marathon_version: "0.8.1"
marathon_version: "0.11.1"
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

version change must be in a separate commit

@ernestas-poskus
Copy link
Member

ernestas-poskus commented Jun 5, 2016

please add little test to .travis.yml

@ernestas-poskus
Copy link
Member

ping @fpgeek

@lhoss
Copy link
Contributor

lhoss commented Sep 7, 2016

@fpgeek you could also set the framework_name using the new feature added yesterday by #28

@ernestas-poskus
Copy link
Member

Closing due to lack of activity.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants