Skip to content

Untangling: Show "Jetpack -> Subscribers" menu on all sites #44302

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jul 17, 2025

Conversation

mmtr
Copy link
Member

@mmtr mmtr commented Jul 14, 2025

Fixes DOTCOM-13884

Proposed changes:

  • Move the /subscribers/:site path to the Jetpack > Subscribers menu for all sites (that menu was previously only visible with the classic interface).
  • The existing Users > Subscribers menu (only visible with the default interface) will now point to /subscribers/jetpack-subscribers/:site so we can inform users with a callout that the menu has been moved (see DOTCOM-13883). This menu will be removed after a month, and it's only visible to existing users.
Site / Interface Before After
Simple / Default Screenshot 2025-07-14 at 08 07 43
  • Jetpack > Subscribers does not exist.
Screenshot 2025-07-14 at 17 17 12
  • Jetpack > Subscribers is now visible.
Simple / Classic Screenshot 2025-07-14 at 08 10 34
  • Jetpack > Subscribers already exists.
Screenshot 2025-07-14 at 08 10 34
  • No changes.
Atomic / Simple Screenshot 2025-07-14 at 08 59 09
  • Jetpack > Subscribers does not exist.
Screenshot 2025-07-14 at 17 20 51
  • Jetpack > Subscribers is now visible.
Atomic / Classic Screenshot 2025-07-14 at 08 59 49
  • Jetpack > Subscribers already exists.
Screenshot 2025-07-14 at 08 59 49
  • No changes.

Other information:

  • Have you written new tests for your changes, if applicable?
  • Have you checked the E2E test CI results, and verified that your changes do not break them?
  • Have you tested your changes on WordPress.com, if applicable (if so, you'll see a generated comment below with a script to run)?

Jetpack product discussion

N/A

Does this pull request change what data or activity we track or use?

No

Testing instructions:

  • Apply these changes to your WP.com site
  • Make sure that "Jetpack > Subscribers" is visible on the default admin interface
  • Make sure it points to /subscribers/:site
  • Make sure that "Tools > Monetize" is only visible on the default admin interface and only for existing users.
  • Make sure it points to /subscibers/jetpack-subscribers/:site (on a follow-up, this route will display a callout, see see DOTCOM-13883).

@mmtr mmtr added [Type] Task [Status] Needs Team Review Obsolete. Use Needs Review instead. labels Jul 14, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jul 14, 2025

Are you an Automattician? Please test your changes on all WordPress.com environments to help mitigate accidental explosions.

  • To test on WoA, go to the Plugins menu on a WoA dev site. Click on the "Upload" button and follow the upgrade flow to be able to upload, install, and activate the Jetpack Beta plugin. Once the plugin is active, go to Jetpack > Jetpack Beta, select your plugin (Jetpack or WordPress.com Site Helper), and enable the dotcom-13884-untangling-ia-show-jetpack-subscribers-menu branch.
  • To test on Simple, run the following command on your sandbox:
bin/jetpack-downloader test jetpack dotcom-13884-untangling-ia-show-jetpack-subscribers-menu
bin/jetpack-downloader test jetpack-mu-wpcom-plugin dotcom-13884-untangling-ia-show-jetpack-subscribers-menu

Interested in more tips and information?

  • In your local development environment, use the jetpack rsync command to sync your changes to a WoA dev blog.
  • Read more about our development workflow here: PCYsg-eg0-p2
  • Figure out when your changes will be shipped to customers here: PCYsg-eg5-p2

@github-actions github-actions bot added [Feature] Masterbar WordPress.com Toolbar and Dashboard customizations [mu wpcom Feature] Wpcom Admin Menu [Package] Jetpack mu wpcom WordPress.com Features [Package] Masterbar labels Jul 14, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

Thank you for your PR!

When contributing to Jetpack, we have a few suggestions that can help us test and review your patch:

  • ✅ Include a description of your PR changes.
  • ✅ Add a "[Status]" label (In Progress, Needs Review, ...).
  • ✅ Add a "[Type]" label (Bug, Enhancement, Janitorial, Task).
  • ✅ Add testing instructions.
  • ✅ Specify whether this PR includes any changes to data or privacy.
  • ✅ Add changelog entries to affected projects

This comment will be updated as you work on your PR and make changes. If you think that some of those checks are not needed for your PR, please explain why you think so. Thanks for cooperation 🤖


Follow this PR Review Process:

  1. Ensure all required checks appearing at the bottom of this PR are passing.
  2. Make sure to test your changes on all platforms that it applies to. You're responsible for the quality of the code you ship.
  3. You can use GitHub's Reviewers functionality to request a review.
  4. When it's reviewed and merged, you will be pinged in Slack to deploy the changes to WordPress.com simple once the build is done.

If you have questions about anything, reach out in #jetpack-developers for guidance!

@mmtr mmtr requested a review from a team July 14, 2025 15:25
Copy link

jp-launch-control bot commented Jul 14, 2025

Code Coverage Summary

Coverage changed in 2 files.

File Coverage Δ% Δ Uncovered
projects/packages/masterbar/src/admin-menu/class-wpcom-admin-menu.php 43/151 (28.48%) 0.37% -2 💚
projects/packages/masterbar/src/admin-menu/class-atomic-admin-menu.php 65/149 (43.62%) 0.86% -3 💚

Full summary · PHP report · JS report

Copy link
Member

@jeherve jeherve left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

One thing we haven't done until now, but maybe worth considering, is whether we should show those menu items on WoA sites when the Subscriptions module is inactive. The menus aren't that useful when the feature is off, so maybe they should not be displayed?

dsas
dsas previously approved these changes Jul 16, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@dsas dsas left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

All works fine for me, though Jeremy asks a good question 🤔 .

@mmtr
Copy link
Member Author

mmtr commented Jul 17, 2025

when the Subscriptions module is inactive

Can that module be deactivated? I don't find it in the Modules page:

Screenshot 2025-07-17 at 11 19 08

Base automatically changed from dotcom-13810-untangling-ia-show-jetpack-monetize-menu to trunk July 17, 2025 10:58
@mmtr mmtr dismissed dsas’s stale review July 17, 2025 10:58

The base branch was changed.

@mmtr mmtr force-pushed the dotcom-13884-untangling-ia-show-jetpack-subscribers-menu branch from 29bb3ab to b4b3577 Compare July 17, 2025 10:59
@mmtr mmtr removed the DO NOT MERGE don't merge it! label Jul 17, 2025
@mmtr
Copy link
Member Author

mmtr commented Jul 17, 2025

when the Subscriptions module is inactive

Can that module be deactivated? I don't find it in the Modules page

Looks like the Subscription module is renamed to Newsletter.

If I disable it, I still can manage the subscribers through the /subscribers/:site path, so apparently it doesn't matter whether the module is on or off? Or maybe I'm missing something.

I'm merging for now anyway, since this PR doesn't introduce a change in the menu visibility – it just moves it to a different location. If we need to unregister/hide the menu under some other circumstances, we can do it as a follow-up.

@mmtr mmtr merged commit f71d3bc into trunk Jul 17, 2025
70 checks passed
@mmtr mmtr deleted the dotcom-13884-untangling-ia-show-jetpack-subscribers-menu branch July 17, 2025 11:47
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the [Status] Needs Team Review Obsolete. Use Needs Review instead. label Jul 17, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants