-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 47
Add minCost parameter #295
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
roconnor-blockstream
wants to merge
1
commit into
master
Choose a base branch
from
minCost
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
In d2c2de5:
I think we want this
<=
to be a<
. Then bothminCost
andmaxCost
are inclusive bounds, which I think is what's implied by their names.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm okay with renaming these fields, but as per the design in #290, the ranges must be non-overlapping:
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
In the code you allow
l == b
while in #290 you sorta imply, but don't explicitly say, thatl
would beb - 1
except that because of encoding edge cases sometimes it'll have to beb -
2.You could have just as easily used non-strict inequalities, and said that
l
would beb
, except that because of encoding edge cases sometimes it'll have to beb - 1
.If you did that, you would be redefining
l
, but I think everything would still make sense. And maybe be a bit simpler to understand.I'm fine with keeping the design as-is, matching #290, but if we do then I definitely think we should rename
minCost
. It could be calledminCostMinusOne
, ormaxInvalidCost
, or something. Hopefully you can think of a less ugly name.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I allow l == b in the sense that it isn't precondition violating to pass those arguments, however if you do pass arguments such that l == b then there is no code-path that will return
SIMPLICTY_OK
; it will always at least either returnSIMPLICITY_ERR_EXEC_MEMORY
orSIMPLICITY_ERR_OVERWEIGHT
(or possibly some other error if you have like type errors and such that are found first).I allow
l == b
so that degenerate requests can be made without violating my precondition.That said, I'm happy to drop that precondition and just double check that everything remains sensible when the user passes b < l.
Unfortunately no. The issues is that the API takes mincosts and maxcosts in terms of WU, but the weight calculations are done in milliWU. Obviously subtracting 1 WU is not the same as subtracting 1 milliWU.
The conversion from WU to milliWU is done on line 386. Maybe I should change variable names to note their units to make this more apparent.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ok, I understand!
Can you add a comment explaining that both values are in milliWU, but the granularity of the cost bounds will be in wu, where wu n is represented by the half-open interval (1000 * (n - 1), 1000 * n], and that we therefore check
minCost
using a strict inequality andmaxCost
using a<=
inequality.I think that the existing names are fine as long as you provide that intuition pump.