Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Sep 12, 2024. It is now read-only.

Conversation

vlimant
Copy link
Contributor

@vlimant vlimant commented Jun 18, 2020

"fixes" #588

rucio returned

(u'/Wprimetotb_M2000W600_LH_TuneCP5_13TeV-madgraph-pythia8/RunIISummer16NanoAODv7-PUMoriond17_Nano02Apr2020_102X_mcRun2_asymptotic_v8-v1/NANOAODSIM#04ef69e5-9084-4649-89d7-8ce9552f786f', None)

for the block length.

BTW: rucio setup could be more integrated

@vlimant vlimant mentioned this pull request Jun 18, 2020
@sharad1126
Copy link
Contributor

thanks @vlimant . that's a good catch as I was expecting something similar but it's not coming from the function you updated here instead it is coming from getFileCountPerBlock.

@vlimant
Copy link
Contributor Author

vlimant commented Jun 19, 2020

@sharad1126 have you tried to run checkor on task_B2G-RunIISummer16NanoAODv7-02956 with the changes I commited ? I cannot (see #591)

@sharad1126
Copy link
Contributor

@vlimant how do you run checkor on a specific wf? I have never seen any option like -w or something which restricts checkor to run on any particular wf

@sharad1126
Copy link
Contributor

/revert 4afceab

@vlimant
Copy link
Contributor Author

vlimant commented Jun 19, 2020

could @amaltaro check quikly how a None was maybe injected in Rucio in the first place?
otherwise one has to create an issue to rucio jira (@ericvaandering)

@ericvaandering
Copy link

I was worried that this was just a metadata field which could be out of sync with list-contents, but I don't think so: https://github.com/rucio/rucio/blob/06b662cd4d0561861c8c23759e83eb6715f28f30/lib/rucio/core/did.py#L1149

Anyhow, None is the intended "length" for empty collections

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants