Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: Fix new lints in Rust 1.84 #170

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 13, 2025
Merged

chore: Fix new lints in Rust 1.84 #170

merged 1 commit into from
Jan 13, 2025

Conversation

aborgna-q
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 13, 2025

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 33.33333% with 2 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 82.29%. Comparing base (b6e266c) to head (1e5d3ff).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
src/multiportgraph.rs 0.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
src/view/region.rs 0.00% 0 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #170   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   82.29%   82.29%           
=======================================
  Files          23       23           
  Lines        5830     5830           
  Branches     5830     5830           
=======================================
  Hits         4798     4798           
  Misses        956      956           
  Partials       76       76           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@aborgna-q aborgna-q requested a review from doug-q January 13, 2025 10:58
@aborgna-q aborgna-q added this pull request to the merge queue Jan 13, 2025
Merged via the queue into main with commit 694be2d Jan 13, 2025
11 of 12 checks passed
@aborgna-q aborgna-q deleted the ab/fix-lints branch January 13, 2025 12:16
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants