Add: NovAI - #23
Open
vvvvking wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Adds NovAI (https://aiapi-pro.com) as a new provider.
What this PR does
gateways/novai.md— full detail page (Quick Facts, per-model USD pricing table, supported models, pros/cons)data/candidates.txt— seeds the domain so the automated/v1/modelsprobe can classify itdata/sites.yaml— override withregion: global,verdict: needs_review, and a factual noteCriteria check (per CONTRIBUTING.md)
https://aiapi-pro.com/v1(OpenAI-compatible)Notes
I deliberately did not hand-edit
data/gateways.jsonor the README leaderboard with invented probe/score data — I left those to your automated checks so the score/uptime/verdict stay independent. The detail page also leaves the Review Score blank for maintainer/community rating.Disclosure: I'm affiliated with NovAI (operator self-submission), so I've set
verdict: needs_reviewand marked the entry unverified per the Code of Conduct. Happy to be canary-probed and to correct any field or drop the entry at your discretion.