Second Approach to Fix #5420

[Allmoz]

This is a second approach to solve #5420 (first one is #8774). In this case, blocks are actually loaded on a wrapped servel level (that can contain only 1 block) to be able to use .onRemove on them. This should be a more general solution, but i don't know if is less performant. @VoidLeech is this better?

[VoidLeech]

This does look like a better solution to me (assuming it works), simply because there's no hardcoding every case, which will be more compatible with other mods and is less prone to breaking when a new feature is released.
Performance-wise this might perform slightly worse /w the level creation (but tbf that's only once per disassembly)

But kind reminder that the decision on what's better isn't mine to take (:

[VoidLeech]

Is world actually always a serverlevel here?

[Allmoz]

Good point, i was assuming so since you can't add entities (drop items) if not. I can probably change it also to create the level only on the first fail

[Allmoz]

thanks for the remainder, but i'm taking you down to the rabbit hole nonetheless :P (I really appreciate your help). Made the changes, now it will only create the level wrapper the first time a block "fails" to be placed and only if it's a server level. I did kept the sound event for both cases since the overridden destroy I did in the wrapped level is silent (no event is called there).