Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

increase default value for auth artifacts retrieval #34361

Draft
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

misteriaud
Copy link
Contributor

What does this PR do?

Motivation

Describe how you validated your changes

Possible Drawbacks / Trade-offs

Additional Notes

@misteriaud
Copy link
Contributor Author

/trigger-ci --variable RUN_ALL_BUILDS=true --variable RUN_KITCHEN_TESTS=true --variable RUN_E2E_TESTS=on --variable RUN_UNIT_TESTS=on --variable RUN_KMT_TESTS=on

@dd-devflow
Copy link

dd-devflow bot commented Feb 24, 2025

View all feedbacks in Devflow UI.
2025-02-24 15:12:16 UTC ℹ️ Start processing command /trigger-ci --variable RUN_ALL_BUILDS=true --variable RUN_KITCHEN_TESTS=true --variable RUN_E2E_TESTS=on --variable RUN_UNIT_TESTS=on --variable RUN_KMT_TESTS=on


2025-02-24 15:13:10 UTC ℹ️ Gitlab pipeline started

Started pipeline #56758167

@github-actions github-actions bot added team/agent-configuration short review PR is simple enough to be reviewed quickly labels Feb 24, 2025
@agent-platform-auto-pr
Copy link
Contributor

agent-platform-auto-pr bot commented Feb 24, 2025

Test changes on VM

Use this command from test-infra-definitions to manually test this PR changes on a VM:

inv aws.create-vm --pipeline-id=56758167 --os-family=ubuntu

Note: This applies to commit af708c9

@agent-platform-auto-pr
Copy link
Contributor

agent-platform-auto-pr bot commented Feb 24, 2025

Uncompressed package size comparison

Comparison with ancestor 34ccc22dffac1b8568774c53bd996605e800b900

Diff per package
package diff status size ancestor threshold
datadog-agent-amd64-deb 0.00MB 859.59MB 859.59MB 0.50MB
datadog-agent-x86_64-rpm 0.00MB 869.36MB 869.36MB 0.50MB
datadog-agent-x86_64-suse 0.00MB 869.36MB 869.36MB 0.50MB
datadog-agent-arm64-deb 0.00MB 848.91MB 848.91MB 0.50MB
datadog-agent-aarch64-rpm 0.00MB 858.65MB 858.65MB 0.50MB
datadog-dogstatsd-amd64-deb 0.00MB 41.41MB 41.41MB 0.50MB
datadog-dogstatsd-x86_64-rpm 0.00MB 41.49MB 41.49MB 0.50MB
datadog-dogstatsd-x86_64-suse 0.00MB 41.49MB 41.49MB 0.50MB
datadog-dogstatsd-arm64-deb 0.00MB 39.67MB 39.67MB 0.50MB
datadog-heroku-agent-amd64-deb 0.00MB 443.42MB 443.42MB 0.50MB
datadog-iot-agent-amd64-deb 0.00MB 62.03MB 62.03MB 0.50MB
datadog-iot-agent-x86_64-rpm 0.00MB 62.10MB 62.10MB 0.50MB
datadog-iot-agent-x86_64-suse 0.00MB 62.10MB 62.10MB 0.50MB
datadog-iot-agent-arm64-deb 0.00MB 59.27MB 59.27MB 0.50MB
datadog-iot-agent-aarch64-rpm 0.00MB 59.34MB 59.34MB 0.50MB

Decision

✅ Passed

@agent-platform-auto-pr
Copy link
Contributor

agent-platform-auto-pr bot commented Feb 24, 2025

Static quality checks ✅

Please find below the results from static quality gates

Successful checks

Info

Result Quality gate On disk size On disk size limit On wire size On wire size limit
static_quality_gate_agent_deb_amd64 831.42MiB 847.49MiB 201.79MiB 212.33MiB
static_quality_gate_agent_deb_arm64 821.17MiB 836.66MiB 182.52MiB 192.5MiB
static_quality_gate_agent_rpm_amd64 831.56MiB 847.82MiB 204.56MiB 215.76MiB
static_quality_gate_agent_rpm_arm64 821.28MiB 836.66MiB 184.01MiB 194.24MiB
static_quality_gate_agent_suse_amd64 831.47MiB 847.82MiB 204.56MiB 215.76MiB
static_quality_gate_agent_suse_arm64 821.25MiB 836.66MiB 184.01MiB 194.24MiB
static_quality_gate_dogstatsd_deb_amd64 39.57MiB 49.7MiB 10.55MiB 20.6MiB
static_quality_gate_dogstatsd_deb_arm64 37.91MiB 48.1MiB 9.13MiB 19.1MiB
static_quality_gate_dogstatsd_rpm_amd64 39.57MiB 49.7MiB 10.56MiB 20.6MiB
static_quality_gate_dogstatsd_suse_amd64 39.57MiB 49.7MiB 10.56MiB 20.6MiB
static_quality_gate_iot_agent_deb_amd64 59.23MiB 69.0MiB 14.88MiB 24.8MiB
static_quality_gate_iot_agent_deb_arm64 56.59MiB 66.4MiB 12.85MiB 22.8MiB
static_quality_gate_iot_agent_rpm_amd64 59.23MiB 69.0MiB 14.9MiB 24.8MiB
static_quality_gate_iot_agent_rpm_arm64 56.6MiB 66.4MiB 12.85MiB 22.8MiB
static_quality_gate_iot_agent_suse_amd64 59.23MiB 69.0MiB 14.9MiB 24.8MiB
static_quality_gate_docker_agent_amd64 915.89MiB 931.7MiB 307.43MiB 318.67MiB
static_quality_gate_docker_agent_arm64 928.97MiB 944.08MiB 292.43MiB 303.0MiB
static_quality_gate_docker_agent_jmx_amd64 1.09GiB 1.1GiB 382.54MiB 393.75MiB
static_quality_gate_docker_agent_jmx_arm64 1.09GiB 1.1GiB 363.51MiB 373.71MiB
static_quality_gate_docker_dogstatsd_amd64 47.71MiB 57.88MiB 18.26MiB 28.29MiB
static_quality_gate_docker_dogstatsd_arm64 46.09MiB 56.27MiB 17.02MiB 27.06MiB
static_quality_gate_docker_cluster_agent_amd64 264.95MiB 274.78MiB 106.33MiB 116.28MiB
static_quality_gate_docker_cluster_agent_arm64 280.91MiB 290.82MiB 101.17MiB 111.12MiB

Copy link

cit-pr-commenter bot commented Feb 24, 2025

Regression Detector

Regression Detector Results

Metrics dashboard
Target profiles
Run ID: c7ea041e-86d8-4530-853f-64c2bf898d8c

Baseline: 34ccc22
Comparison: af708c9
Diff

Optimization Goals: ✅ No significant changes detected

Fine details of change detection per experiment

perf experiment goal Δ mean % Δ mean % CI trials links
file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency egress throughput +0.89 [+0.10, +1.67] 1 Logs
quality_gate_idle memory utilization +0.41 [+0.35, +0.47] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard
tcp_syslog_to_blackhole ingress throughput +0.35 [+0.28, +0.43] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency_linear_load egress throughput +0.04 [-0.42, +0.51] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http1 egress throughput +0.02 [-0.77, +0.82] 1 Logs
uds_dogstatsd_to_api ingress throughput +0.02 [-0.28, +0.31] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_300ms_latency egress throughput +0.01 [-0.62, +0.64] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http2 egress throughput +0.01 [-0.80, +0.81] 1 Logs
tcp_dd_logs_filter_exclude ingress throughput +0.00 [-0.02, +0.02] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency egress throughput -0.01 [-0.68, +0.67] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency egress throughput -0.01 [-0.79, +0.77] 1 Logs
uds_dogstatsd_to_api_cpu % cpu utilization -0.01 [-0.99, +0.96] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency egress throughput -0.03 [-0.82, +0.76] 1 Logs
file_tree memory utilization -0.10 [-0.16, -0.04] 1 Logs
quality_gate_idle_all_features memory utilization -0.20 [-0.25, -0.15] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_logs % cpu utilization -1.22 [-4.26, +1.82] 1 Logs

Bounds Checks: ✅ Passed

perf experiment bounds_check_name replicates_passed links
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http1 lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http1 memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http2 lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http2 memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency_linear_load memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_300ms_latency lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_300ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
quality_gate_idle intake_connections 10/10 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_idle memory_usage 10/10 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_idle_all_features intake_connections 10/10 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_idle_all_features memory_usage 10/10 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_logs intake_connections 10/10
quality_gate_logs lost_bytes 10/10
quality_gate_logs memory_usage 10/10

Explanation

Confidence level: 90.00%
Effect size tolerance: |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%

Performance changes are noted in the perf column of each table:

  • ✅ = significantly better comparison variant performance
  • ❌ = significantly worse comparison variant performance
  • ➖ = no significant change in performance

A regression test is an A/B test of target performance in a repeatable rig, where "performance" is measured as "comparison variant minus baseline variant" for an optimization goal (e.g., ingress throughput). Due to intrinsic variability in measuring that goal, we can only estimate its mean value for each experiment; we report uncertainty in that value as a 90.00% confidence interval denoted "Δ mean % CI".

For each experiment, we decide whether a change in performance is a "regression" -- a change worth investigating further -- if all of the following criteria are true:

  1. Its estimated |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%, indicating the change is big enough to merit a closer look.

  2. Its 90.00% confidence interval "Δ mean % CI" does not contain zero, indicating that if our statistical model is accurate, there is at least a 90.00% chance there is a difference in performance between baseline and comparison variants.

  3. Its configuration does not mark it "erratic".

CI Pass/Fail Decision

Passed. All Quality Gates passed.

  • quality_gate_logs, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_logs, bounds check lost_bytes: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_logs, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_idle, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_idle, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_idle_all_features, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_idle_all_features, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
short review PR is simple enough to be reviewed quickly team/agent-configuration
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant