-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.5k
Replace bitnami Kafka Docker images with confluent ones #21206
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
This change is applied to both the kafka and kafka_consumer application since the test setup is similar Issue AI-6103
The following files, which will be shipped with the agent, were modified in this PR and You can ignore this if you are sure the changes in this PR do not require QA. Otherwise, consider removing the label. List of modified files that will be shipped with the agent
|
Nice 👍 |
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
…ove-kafka-bitnami
…within the docker network
The following files, which will be shipped with the agent, were modified in this PR and You can ignore this if you are sure the changes in this PR do not require QA. Otherwise, consider removing the label. List of modified files that will be shipped with the agent
|
The following files, which will be shipped with the agent, were modified in this PR and You can ignore this if you are sure the changes in this PR do not require QA. Otherwise, consider removing the label. List of modified files that will be shipped with the agent
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks great, thanks so much! Just left one non-blocking comment
@@ -1,23 +1,32 @@ | |||
services: | |||
zookeeper: | |||
image: bitnami/zookeeper:3.8.0 | |||
image: confluentinc/cp-zookeeper:7.2.0 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
nit- should we use CONFLUENT_VERSION
here? Or create ZK_VERSION
again? I had the same comment for the other integrations.
What does this PR do?
Replace bitnami docker images for Kafka and Kafka Consumer integrations with confluent images instead.
Motivation
Bitnami has removed their open images from the public regsitry. They provided a legacy registry where they are keeping them but if we need to move we better move to a separate source. The legacy ones will be frozen and won't be updated anymore.
Review checklist (to be filled by reviewers)
qa/skip-qa
label if the PR doesn't need to be tested during QA.backport/<branch-name>
label to the PR and it will automatically open a backport PR once this one is merged