Skip to content

Conversation

@abrudz
Copy link
Member

@abrudz abrudz commented Nov 26, 2025

  • Pushed categories down a level so the orthogonal "System Variables" gets more prominent
  • Added Syntax column
  • Split some categories
  • Moved some entries to more appropriate categories
  • Created list of archaic/deprecated features

- Pushed categories down a level so the orthogonal "System Variables" gets more prominent
- Added Syntax column
- Split some categories
- Moved some entries to more appropriate categories
- Created list of archaic/deprecated features
@abrudz abrudz linked an issue Nov 26, 2025 that may be closed by this pull request
@abrudz abrudz changed the title Rework Rework sysfn list Nov 27, 2025
@abrudz abrudz requested a review from FionaDyalog November 27, 2025 10:15
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm not convinced that "Syntax" is the correct label for the third column in these tables. Let's discuss.

### System Constants

## System Constants
These constants are convenient names for commonly used values that would otherwise be tedious or errorprone to type out or produce.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
These constants are convenient names for commonly used values that would otherwise be tedious or errorprone to type out or produce.
These constants simplify calling commonly-used values.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Calling isn't the right word here. You can't call a value. Maybe "access to"?


These are outdated facilites that have newer and better alternatives.

|Name |Description |Syntax|Alternative|
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Four of the entries do not have alternative suggestions – for completeness and to justify their place in this table, can something be added for them please.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Added for ⎕XT but ⎕EXPORT and ⎕PATH have no current alternative. We're working on the design of a module system that will eventually provide an alternative.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If there is no current alternative then it's hard to justify having them in this list!

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No,this is the list for archaic features, and the documentation for ⎕PATH and ⎕EXPORT have since 18.0 (i.e. beyond all supported versions) said "⎕PATH/⎕EXPORT may therefore be considered an archaic feature."

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

LangRef: Rework the page for categorisation of system functions

3 participants