Skip to content

Add search this user/agent to ProfilePage - #98091

Open
hungvu193 wants to merge 9 commits into
Expensify:mainfrom
hungvu193:feat-98076-add-search-user
Open

Add search this user/agent to ProfilePage#98091
hungvu193 wants to merge 9 commits into
Expensify:mainfrom
hungvu193:feat-98076-add-search-user

Conversation

@hungvu193

@hungvu193 hungvu193 commented Aug 9, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Explanation of Change

Add "🔍 Search this user" (or "Search this agent") to all profiles to view all report actions of that user/agent.

Fixed Issues

$ #98076
PROPOSAL: N/A

Tests

Same as QA steps.

  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

N/A

QA Steps

// TODO: These must be filled out, or the issue title must include "[No QA]."

  1. Go to a room or a chat.
  2. Click on a agent profile > Verify there's Search this agent button > Click on it
  3. Verify it navigates to Search and filters that agent's messages.
  4. Go back to any other chat and click on a user profile > Search this user
  5. Verify it navigates to Search and filter that user's messages.
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG))
  • If new assets were added or existing ones were modified, I verified that:
    • The assets are optimized and compressed (for SVG files, run npm run compress-svg)
    • The assets load correctly across all supported platforms.
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • I added unit tests for any new feature or bug fix in this PR to help automatically prevent regressions in this user flow.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native
Screen.Recording.2026-08-09.at.14.37.48.mov
Android: mWeb Chrome
Screen.Recording.2026-08-09.at.14.37.48.mov
iOS: Native
Screen.Recording.2026-08-09.at.14.33.53.mov
iOS: mWeb Safari
Screen.Recording.2026-08-09.at.13.33.44.mov
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
Screen.Recording.2026-08-10.at.10.06.23.mov

@melvin-bot

melvin-bot Bot commented Aug 9, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Hey, I noticed you changed src/languages/en.ts in a PR from a fork. For security reasons, translations are not generated automatically for PRs from forks.

If you want to automatically generate translations for other locales, an Expensify employee will have to:

  1. Look at the code and make sure there are no malicious changes.
  2. Run the Generate static translations GitHub workflow. If you have write access and the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

Alternatively, if you are an external contributor, you can run the translation script locally with your own OpenAI API key. To learn more, try running:

npx ts-node ./scripts/generateTranslations.ts --help

Typically, you'd want to translate only what you changed by running npx ts-node ./scripts/generateTranslations.ts --compare-ref main

@hungvu193
hungvu193 marked this pull request as ready for review August 9, 2026 06:26
@hungvu193
hungvu193 requested review from a team as code owners August 9, 2026 06:26
@melvin-bot
melvin-bot Bot requested review from garrettmknight and marufsharifi and removed request for a team August 9, 2026 06:26
@melvin-bot

melvin-bot Bot commented Aug 9, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@marufsharifi Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 2acb4278da

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Codex has been enabled to automatically review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

When you sign up for Codex through ChatGPT, Codex can also answer questions or update the PR, like "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread src/languages/en.ts Outdated
@marufsharifi

marufsharifi commented Aug 9, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified that the composer does not automatically focus or open the keyboard on mobile unless explicitly intended. This includes checking that returning the app from the background does not unexpectedly open the keyboard.
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • Android: HybridApp
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: HybridApp
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • For any bug fix or new feature in this PR, I verified that sufficient unit tests are included to prevent regressions in this flow.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: HybridApp
Android: mWeb Chrome
Screen_Recording_20260813_180109_Chrome.mp4
iOS: HybridApp
Screen.Recording.2026-08-13.at.6.41.53.PM.mov
iOS: mWeb Safari
Screen.Recording.2026-08-13.at.6.53.41.PM.mov
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
Screen.Recording.2026-08-13.at.5.56.28.PM.mov

@marufsharifi

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@hungvu193, could you please check the failure actions, when you get a chance. thanks.

@hungvu193

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Fixed 😄. Btw, I'm asking for confirmation in Slack, so can you please hold the review for a while?

@codecov

codecov Bot commented Aug 9, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ Changes either increased or maintained existing code coverage, great job!

Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
src/pages/ProfilePage.tsx 88.23% <100.00%> (+88.23%) ⬆️
... and 531 files with indirect coverage changes

@hungvu193

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@marufsharifi it's now ready

@marufsharifi

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

I am testing it. thanks.

Comment thread src/pages/ProfilePage.tsx Outdated
Comment thread src/pages/ProfilePage.tsx
Comment thread src/pages/ProfilePage.tsx Outdated
@marufsharifi

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@MelvinBot Review

@MelvinBot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Review — LGTM ✅

The change is clean, minimal, and matches the "Chat with agent" pattern requested in the issue. I verified the feature end-to-end on web and it works as intended.

What I checked

  • The new MenuItem in ProfilePage.tsx:316-329 builds the query with type: chat + from: [accountID] and navigates to SEARCH_ROOT.
  • from is a supported filter for the chat data type (SearchAdvancedFiltersForm.ts:627-631), so buildQueryStringFromFilterFormValues won't strip it.
  • Visibility guard !!accountID && !isAnonymousUserSession() correctly hides the item for accountID === 0 (DEFAULT_NUMBER_ID) and anonymous sessions.
  • Label switches via isAgentEmail(login); login defaulting to '' is handled safely.
  • MagnifyingGlass is a valid Expensicon and correctly added to useMemoizedLazyExpensifyIcons.
  • Translations added for all 11 locales.
  • Only failing checks are checklist / Check independent approval (reviewer-checklist gates), not code checks. Tests, typecheck, lint, React Compiler all pass.

Live test (web): opened a profile → "Search this user" appears with the magnifying-glass icon → clicking it navigated to search?q=type:chat from:8392101, correctly pre-filtering to that user's chats.

Profile page showing Search this user menu item Search screen filtered by that user

Two things worth confirming before approving:

  1. Shown on your own profile too. The guard doesn't exclude isCurrentUser, so "Search this user" also appears on your own profile (searching your own chats). The issue says "add it to every profile … valuable for any user," so this is likely intended — just confirm it's desired rather than accidental.
  2. No unit test in the diff, although the author checklist has "I added unit tests" checked. For a trivial menu item this is often acceptable, but the checkbox/diff mismatch is worth reconciling.

I couldn't exercise the "Search this agent" label live (no *@expensify.ai agent chat in the test account), but the branch logic at ProfilePage.tsx:319 is correct — worth a manual check against a real agent profile (e.g. RuleBot) during QA.

garrettmknight
garrettmknight previously approved these changes Aug 10, 2026

@garrettmknight garrettmknight left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good from a product perspective

@hungvu193
hungvu193 requested a review from marufsharifi August 11, 2026 04:33
@hungvu193

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Address all your comments. It's now ready for your another review @marufsharifi

Comment thread src/pages/ProfilePage.tsx
onPress={callFunctionIfActionIsAllowed(() => switchToDelegator(login))}
/>
)}
{!!accountID && !isAnonymousUserSession() && !!login && (

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This also renders on the current user's own profile.

There's no !isCurrentUser guard, so viewing your own profile shows "Search this user" (searching your own messages). The QA steps only cover other users/agents. The issue says "all profiles", so this may be intended @Expensify/design could you please confirm this. thanks.

F1.mov

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@hungvu193, this is still not clear is it?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is expected

Comment thread src/pages/ProfilePage.tsx
@dannymcclain
dannymcclain requested a review from a team August 11, 2026 12:52
@dannymcclain

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@Expensify/design what do you all think of this? I'm not really sold. "Search this user" feels super ambiguous to me.

@shawnborton

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Yeah, that wording feels odd and I agree we should do something else. "View agent history" or "View completed actions" feels better, something like that.

Also, I wanted to confirm that we always show this MenuItem in the same stack as the Copilot row? I see in some videos above they were separated:
CleanShot 2026-08-11 at 11 16 13@2x

@dannymcclain

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Agree with your placement suggestion. And I think I like View agent history because this is essentially just a search returning all messages from the agent / user. So they might not all be actions.

@quinthar quinthar added the #ai label Aug 11, 2026
@dubielzyk-expensify

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Agree with Shawn and Danny. Both placement and wording feels better with their suggestions.

@hungvu193

hungvu193 commented Aug 12, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Also, I wanted to confirm that we always show this MenuItem in the same stack as the Copilot row? I see in some videos above they were separated:

It's right below the copilot menu item. I forgot to update the screenshots after discussing on Slack, let me update it

Screen.Recording.2026-08-10.at.10.06.23.mov

@hungvu193

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

just to confirm, with agent we will show: View agent history and with user we will show View user history right?

@shawnborton

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Oh I didn't realize we were doing this for regular users too but I guess that makes sense.

@shawnborton

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

I also kind of think the "Notify me" setting would be above the MenuItems. Basically the block of MenuItems would be the very last thing in that RHP:
CleanShot 2026-08-12 at 08 57 42@2x

@hungvu193

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

I see. I'll update it shortly. Thanks for confirmation 🙏

@hungvu193

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Updated

Screen.Recording.2026-08-12.at.23.11.15.mov

@shawnborton

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

I think that looks good 👍

@hungvu193
hungvu193 requested a review from marufsharifi August 13, 2026 03:25
@quinthar quinthar removed the #ai label Aug 13, 2026
@marufsharifi

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

checking again. thanks.

@marufsharifi

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@hungvu193, could you please check this. thanks.

RF-1

@melvin-bot

melvin-bot Bot commented Aug 14, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Hey, I noticed you changed src/languages/en.ts in a PR from a fork. For security reasons, translations are not generated automatically for PRs from forks.

If you want to automatically generate translations for other locales, an Expensify employee will have to:

  1. Look at the code and make sure there are no malicious changes.
  2. Run the Generate static translations GitHub workflow. If you have write access and the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

Alternatively, if you are an external contributor, you can run the translation script locally with your own OpenAI API key. To learn more, try running:

npx bun ./scripts/generateTranslations.ts --help

Typically, you'd want to translate only what you changed by running npx bun ./scripts/generateTranslations.ts --compare-ref main

@hungvu193

hungvu193 commented Aug 14, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Fixed. Can you verify again?

Screen.Recording.2026-08-14.at.09.05.28.mov

@hungvu193, could you please check this. thanks.

@marufsharifi marufsharifi left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good, bug some minor suggestions.

Comment thread src/pages/ProfilePage.tsx
Comment thread src/languages/en.ts
Comment on lines +2146 to +2147
searchThisUser: 'View user history',
searchThisAgent: 'View agent history',

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

NAB: Key name doesn't match the copy (naming nit, not a STYLE.md blocker)

These keys are named searchThisUser / searchThisAgent, but the value in every locale reads "View … history" (e.g. de.ts: 'Nutzerverlauf anzeigen', es.ts: 'Ver historial del usuario'). The naming is at least consistent across all 11 locale files, so it's purely cosmetic — but anyone grepping for the "search" copy won't find it, and vice-versa.

MY Suggestion

  • Rename the keys to viewUserHistory / viewAgentHistory (matches the copy

Comment thread src/pages/ProfilePage.tsx
)}
{shouldShowNotificationPreference && (
<MenuItemWithTopDescription
{!!accountID && !isAnonymousUserSession() && !!login && (

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Missing test — the !!login false-branch of this guard is uncovered (failure path).

This guard has three && conditions, but the tests only exercise the TRUE render and the isAnonymousUserSession() hide. The !!login branch is untested and it's genuinely reachable — login = details?.login ?? '', so any profiled account whose personal details lack a login (e.g. an optimistic/unvalidated account) will hide this entry.

Please add a test in tests/ui/ProfilePageTest.tsx, inside the ProfilePage - View user history describe:

it('hides the search entry when the profile has no login', async () => {
    // seed personalDetails[123] WITHOUT a login → login resolves to ''
    // render, then:
    expect(screen.queryByText('View user history')).not.toBeOnTheScreen();
    expect(screen.queryByText('View agent history')).not.toBeOnTheScreen();
});

Comment thread src/pages/ProfilePage.tsx
Comment on lines +335 to +339
const query = buildQueryStringFromFilterFormValues({
type: CONST.SEARCH.DATA_TYPES.CHAT,
from: [String(accountID)],
});
Navigation.navigate(ROUTES.SEARCH_ROOT.getRoute({query}));

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Low Consistency question rawQuery

Other Search entry points pass both query and rawQuery, e.g. CardSection.tsx:123:

ROUTES.SEARCH_ROOT.getRoute({query, rawQuery: query})

Here only query is passed. Is omitting rawQuery intentional for this chat search, or should it match the other call sites?

Comment thread src/pages/ProfilePage.tsx
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants