feat: migrates webhooks to RTK

[tiagoapolo]

Thanks for submitting a PR! Please check the boxes below:

• I have added information to docs/ if required so people know about the feature!
• I have filled in the "Changes" section below?
• I have filled in the "How did you test this code" section below?
• I have used a Conventional Commit title for this Pull Request

Changes

• This pull request implements useWebhooks custom hook in order to replace withWebhooks
• Migrates webhooks state to RTK

How did you test this code?

[github-actions]

Docker builds report

Image	Build Status	Security report
ghcr.io/flagsmith/flagsmith-api-test:pr-5087	Finished ✅	Skipped
ghcr.io/flagsmith/flagsmith-e2e:pr-5087	Finished ✅	Skipped
ghcr.io/flagsmith/flagsmith-api:pr-5087	Finished ✅	Results ✅
ghcr.io/flagsmith/flagsmith:pr-5087	Finished ✅	Results ✅
ghcr.io/flagsmith/flagsmith-private-cloud:pr-5087	Finished ✅	Results ✅
ghcr.io/flagsmith/flagsmith-frontend:pr-5087	Finished ✅	Results ✅

[vercel]

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name	Status	Preview	Comments	Updated (UTC)
flagsmith-frontend-preview	✅ Ready (Inspect)	Visit Preview	💬 Add feedback	Feb 11, 2025 1:23am
flagsmith-frontend-staging	✅ Ready (Inspect)	Visit Preview	💬 Add feedback	Feb 11, 2025 1:23am

1 Skipped Deployment

Name	Status	Preview	Comments	Updated (UTC)
docs	⬜️ Ignored (Inspect)			Feb 11, 2025 1:23am

[github-actions]

Uffizzi Ephemeral Environment deployment-60801

☁️ https://app.uffizzi.com/github.com/Flagsmith/flagsmith/pull/5087

📄 View Application Logs etc.

What is Uffizzi? Learn more!

[kyle-ssg]

Although this simplifies syntax I'm not sure this file is necessary, we don't have this sort of pattern elsewhere - can just use the useCreate etc directly

[kyle-ssg]

I think this PR should probably remove the withWebhooks.js functionality to be complete