Skip to content

New flower Reiujia#53

Draft
LooseEthics wants to merge 3 commits intoGTNewHorizons:masterfrom
LooseEthics:nuclear-entopinnyum
Draft

New flower Reiujia#53
LooseEthics wants to merge 3 commits intoGTNewHorizons:masterfrom
LooseEthics:nuclear-entopinnyum

Conversation

@LooseEthics
Copy link

@LooseEthics LooseEthics commented Mar 19, 2026

If you can't solve a problem with brute force, you're not using enough of it.

Moved from GTNewHorizons/Botania#129

An evolution of Entropinnyum.
Vast mana generation potential and base wipe protection rolled into one neat package.
100 times the mana capacity, eats nuclear explosions, very convenient, probably expensive.
Supports sparks.

How to get it:
Runic altar research -> research -> infusion recipe with several Entropinnyums, Radio, and some flavor items.
One useless essentia is now marginally less so.
2026-03-23_18 23 05

Things to address / ideas:

  • Direct functionality upgrade or spicy explosions only?
  • Astrum essentia in recipe? Thematic, but effectively gates it behind Wisp EEC. Then again that shouldn't be much of a problem when this flower becomes relevant.
  • A more complex behavior to promote actually using it for generation instead of just protection. Instead of only processing explosion events when mana level is 0, accept always. But if the mana overflows the flower is destroyed and doesn't catch the final explosion. Reward this by having higher efficiency at higher fill amount. Only really makes sense if we allow conventional explosives, unless we want to promote wrench reactor-esque meme builds.
  • Draconic Evolution explosions?

Builds off of and requires GTNewHorizons/Botania#127

Other changes:

  • Classes for spark-supporting flowers

TODO:

  • Recipe + Thaumonomicon research
  • Flower implementation
  • Spark support
  • Lexicon
  • Debug

@LooseEthics LooseEthics changed the title Nuclear entopinnyum New flower Reiujia Mar 19, 2026
@LooseEthics LooseEthics marked this pull request as draft March 19, 2026 11:42
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant