Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
Link to supporting governance information document from the primary g…
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
…overnance document
  • Loading branch information
Relequestual committed Apr 4, 2024
1 parent 36acbf0 commit a85b4c8
Showing 1 changed file with 4 additions and 2 deletions.
6 changes: 4 additions & 2 deletions GOVERNANCE.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -33,9 +33,9 @@ There may be other grounds for removal from the TSC, such as seriously violating

The JSON Schema Project uses 2 different mechanism for decision making:

1. **Consensus**: The JSON Schema Project tries by default to find consensus in all the strategic decision by using the consensus mechanism described below.
1. **Consensus**: The JSON Schema Project tries by default to find consensus in all the strategic decision by using the consensus mechanism described below.

2. **Voting**: It is OK use the voting process for those cases when the discussion has already occurred or discussion and discovery is not required. Voting is a simple yet powerful mechanism.
2. **Voting**: It is OK use the voting process for those cases when the discussion has already occurred or discussion and discovery is not required. Voting is a simple yet powerful mechanism.

### Decision-making via consensus

Expand Down Expand Up @@ -136,6 +136,8 @@ The topic and nature of private votes may remain private, including the results.

The kinds of votes which should be private include things related to security reports or discussions with an entity where it might not be desireable to be made public knowledge to either party. This could include details of case studies or partnerships which are not yet concluded or published, where either party may need a final approval for publication or wishes for coordinated or scheduled public publication.

(You can view the "Decision-making via vote" process as a runnable interactive Finite State Machine in the [governance supporting information document](./docs/governance/supporting-info.md).)

### Documenting decisions

Either initially, or at any point during the process, any TSC member may suggest the issue being discussed is "significant or noteworthy." If there are no objections, the resolution actions for the issue must include the creation of an Any Decision Record (previously named Architectural Decision Record). The Any Decision Record (ADR) should include as much information as is thought to be useful, following the provided template. The Pull Request for the ADR must be approved by all those who were involved in the decision making process, which must also be documented in the ADR as the "deciders."
Expand Down

0 comments on commit a85b4c8

Please sign in to comment.