Skip to content

generalize unmatricize to arbitrary axes #66

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jul 16, 2025
Merged

Conversation

ogauthe
Copy link
Collaborator

@ogauthe ogauthe commented Jul 15, 2025

This PR generalizes unmatricize to arbitrary axes type.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 15, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 94.90%. Comparing base (9341d1d) to head (daaaf9e).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main      #66      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   94.48%   94.90%   +0.41%     
==========================================
  Files          14       14              
  Lines         453      451       -2     
==========================================
  Hits          428      428              
+ Misses         25       23       -2     
Flag Coverage Δ
docs 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@mtfishman
Copy link
Member

@ogauthe should I merge this? Have you checked that this change allows you to use more TensorAlgebra.jl functionality in FusionTensors?

@ogauthe
Copy link
Collaborator Author

ogauthe commented Jul 16, 2025

this is ready to merge

@mtfishman mtfishman merged commit 6d2a13d into ITensor:main Jul 16, 2025
14 checks passed
@ogauthe ogauthe deleted the matricize branch July 16, 2025 18:22
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants