-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 36
Reject legacy snapshots #1774
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
jasagredo
wants to merge
1
commit into
js/tracing-forkers
Choose a base branch
from
js/reject-legacy
base: js/tracing-forkers
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+35
−3
Open
Reject legacy snapshots #1774
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
22 changes: 22 additions & 0 deletions
22
ouroboros-consensus/changelog.d/20251124_165114_javier.sagredo_reject_legacy.md
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,22 @@ | ||
| <!-- | ||
| A new scriv changelog fragment. | ||
|
|
||
| Uncomment the section that is right (remove the HTML comment wrapper). | ||
| For top level release notes, leave all the headers commented out. | ||
| --> | ||
|
|
||
| <!-- | ||
| ### Patch | ||
|
|
||
| - A bullet item for the Patch category. | ||
|
|
||
| --> | ||
| <!-- | ||
| ### Non-Breaking | ||
|
|
||
| - A bullet item for the Non-Breaking category. | ||
|
|
||
| --> | ||
| ### Breaking | ||
|
|
||
| - Legacy snapshots will be rejected and deleted, instead of crashing consensus. | ||
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
From the code, I see that we check if the snapshot is a file and, if so, infer that it is in the legacy format and throw and exception. Is the deletion already done when we handle this exception? Where can I find this code, if it exists?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ah I see, it's not in Consensus, the exception need to be handled in the node. In that case, I think this changelog entry needs to be reformulated:
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The logic is here:
https://github.com/IntersectMBO/ouroboros-consensus/blob/main/ouroboros-consensus/src/ouroboros-consensus/Ouroboros/Consensus/Storage/LedgerDB/API.hs#L596-L601
We delete the snapshot if we get an
InitFailureReadas we do here.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Right. I think I like the approach of emitting a warning and suggesting the convert the snapshot, as you've described in #1708, but if you think that deleting is fine, then let's delete.