-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix evalpoly type instability and 0-length case #56707
Open
stevengj
wants to merge
10
commits into
master
Choose a base branch
from
sgj/evalpoly_fixes
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+33
−14
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
10 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
61df653
fix evalpoly type instability and 0-length case
stevengj 1ee4550
more evalpoly tests
stevengj 1995031
rm unnecessary test
stevengj d22d8f1
rm extraneous methods
stevengj 7a1d9a2
added test for empty-coefficients case, with units
stevengj cf2a6b9
Update base/math.jl
stevengj 9df2b24
Update base/math.jl
stevengj 1d42f4e
Update base/math.jl
stevengj 05cfd26
Update base/math.jl
stevengj f7b9e88
ensure that different generated brnches return same type
stevengj File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I worry a bit about this causing performance regressions (especially in cases where multiplication is not cheap), but I also get that it's likely important.
Ideally we'd be able to do something in the type domain here rather than an actual multiplication, but oh well i guess. This is probably less brittle, and won't regress in most cases.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hopefully the compiler can optimize out
one(x) * p[end]
in most cases, and just compute the type, since the result is not used.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Only if the multiplication is simple enough and free of side effects like memory allocation? If the scalar is eg a BigInt it may not be able to optimize this away?