Skip to content

Conversation

SkafteNicki
Copy link
Collaborator

@SkafteNicki SkafteNicki commented Aug 15, 2025

What does this PR do?

Fixes #19972

Before submitting
  • Was this discussed/agreed via a GitHub issue? (not for typos and docs)
  • Did you read the contributor guideline, Pull Request section?
  • Did you make sure your PR does only one thing, instead of bundling different changes together?
  • Did you make sure to update the documentation with your changes? (if necessary)
  • Did you write any new necessary tests? (not for typos and docs)
  • Did you verify new and existing tests pass locally with your changes?
  • Did you list all the breaking changes introduced by this pull request?
  • Did you update the CHANGELOG? (not for typos, docs, test updates, or minor internal changes/refactors)

PR review

Anyone in the community is welcome to review the PR.
Before you start reviewing, make sure you have read the review guidelines. In short, see the following bullet-list:

Reviewer checklist
  • Is this pull request ready for review? (if not, please submit in draft mode)
  • Check that all items from Before submitting are resolved
  • Make sure the title is self-explanatory and the description concisely explains the PR
  • Add labels and milestones (and optionally projects) to the PR so it can be classified

📚 Documentation preview 📚: https://pytorch-lightning--21074.org.readthedocs.build/en/21074/

@SkafteNicki SkafteNicki self-assigned this Aug 15, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot added the pl Generic label for PyTorch Lightning package label Aug 15, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot added the dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file label Aug 15, 2025
@Borda Borda marked this pull request as draft August 22, 2025 10:47
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file logger: mlflow pl Generic label for PyTorch Lightning package
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Increase MlflowLogger parameter value length limit
2 participants