Implement password management API updates #1
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
This update enhances the authentication API by refining the logic in authentication_api.rb to ensure more reliable and secure handling of authentication requests. In addition, the Gemfile.lock has been updated to align with the latest dependency versions, ensuring compatibility and stability across the application.
Fixes # (issue)
update authentication API
Type of change
Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
How Has This Been Tested?
Ran local server and confirmed login/authentication flow works as expected.
Verified dependencies install and run without errors.
Test A Authentication API request/response validation.
Test B Dependency installation and application startup
Checklist:
[x ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
[x ] I have performed a self-review of my own code
I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
I have made corresponding changes to the documentation if appropriate
[ x] My changes generate no new warnings
I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
I have created or extended unit tests to address my new additions
[x ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream modules
If you have any questions, please contact @macite or @jakerenzella.