Skip to content

Conversation

@ebendler
Copy link

@ebendler ebendler commented Oct 17, 2025

This makes sure that RPMs have the fields that newer releases require.

Also:

  • scrub centos from the release process, its dead
  • update golang URLs to newer google endpoints
  • replace all centos-stream:8 usage with rockylinux:8
  • add "dist" tag to RPMs to distinguish el7 and el8 builds

This will fail CI until this libnvidia-container PR is merged. Come back and update this PR with new third_party pointer when that happens. NVIDIA/libnvidia-container#329

… features newer releases require

Signed-off-by: Ehren Bendler <[email protected]>
@copy-pr-bot
Copy link

copy-pr-bot bot commented Oct 17, 2025

This pull request requires additional validation before any workflows can run on NVIDIA's runners.

Pull request vetters can view their responsibilities here.

Contributors can view more details about this message here.

*) echo "unsupported architecture" ; exit 1 ;; \
esac; \
wget -nv -O - https://storage.googleapis.com/golang/go${GOLANG_VERSION}.linux-${ARCH}.tar.gz \
wget -nv -O - https://dl.google.com/go/go${GOLANG_VERSION}.linux-${ARCH}.tar.gz \
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This change looks out of scope for the commit. (PR description does mention it.

I would prefer to have the 4 items listed on the PR description as standalone commits:

  • scrub centos from the release process, its dead
  • update golang URLs to newer google endpoints
  • replace all centos-stream:8 usage with rockylinux:8
  • add "dist" tag to RPMs to distinguish el7 and el8 builds

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

My understanding is that you're moving to kitmaker in the near-ish future, so this PR is largely pointless. I thought @elezar was going to close it, but don't spend any energy on it.

amazonlinux*) pkg_type=rpm
;;
centos* | rpm) pkg_type=rpm
centos* | rhel* | rpm) pkg_type=rpm
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If we are getting rid of CentOS, does it make sense to continue to list it here?

@ebendler ebendler closed this Nov 4, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants