-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12
Add NixCon sponsorship tiers and process #95
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
9865411
to
51ae532
Compare
doc/nixcon.md
Outdated
- Board respondent: @infinisil or @ra33it0? | ||
- SC respondent: ??? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is a TODO, we need somebody from the board and the SC to be assigned to perform the below process, ideally also a deputy in case of absences.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I can.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I can act as a stand-in/deputy for the SC if Tom is for some reason unavailable.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
End complete sentences with a full stop (.
).
@das-g Thanks, addressed, though I'd like to avoid all non-substantive feedback here, since a lot of people are involved. We will be able to non-substantively improve the presentation before putting it on the website in any case 😉 |
Hashed out initially by @infinisil and @Ra33it0, subsequently refined with the NixCon 2025 organisers.
51ae532
to
7b96b26
Compare
|
||
### How to sponsor | ||
|
||
Send an email to [email protected] (which will forward to both the Nix Steering Committee and the NixOS Foundation board) with: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Would it make sense to use @nixcon.org
for this? Or maybe not, since NixCon is official?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Could be done, both domains are official, but I wouldn't know how that's configured, and we already have a working process for @nixos.org
addresses, which is also already used for [email protected].
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
(An aside: maybe now that NixCon is officially official, we can start using con.nixos.org
or con.nix.dev
or something?)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The NixCon domain is managed by CloudFlare. We use Cloudflare's email forwarding to forward <year>@nixcon.org
to the year's cohort.
Another consideration is when people donate services, equipment, hosting; not directly a monetary donation. Maybe a comment about that case? |
Updated in the NixCon org meeting today according to @tomberek's feedback:
|
I'm also changing something (hopefully uncontroversial) on my own: If somebody donates |
I think it would be nice if sponsorship and catering would be more interconnected. Since it is our biggest cost factor and we really want to provide free food for attendees? |
- Visibility priority is given according to tiers and donation amount. | ||
- The sponsor can selectively abstain from perks. | ||
- Surplus funds will be used to support official Nix projects. | ||
- Reach out if you'd like to sponsor in a more custom way, such as food, drinks, services, equipment, or only specific perks. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@Lassulus Note that we also have this line here, though this is meant for companies that can provide benefits directly instead of funding.
Iirc the reason for not having tiers specifically for e.g. meals was that it's tricky to figure out the right balance between amount and perks. With standard tiers, the entire amount will be available for the organisers to make the best use of. But for a sponsored meal in comparison, most of the amount will need to be spent on the food itself (~10k for a fancy one), removing some of the organisers freedom to choose the best use of the funds. As a consequence, for the same amount as the standard tiers, perks should be reduced, or for the same perks as standard tiers, the amount should be increased.
That said, I think we could make it work and I would be in favor of a good proposal, but for now would like to defer this to not delay sponsoring further. There's nothing stopping us from proposing more tiers later on.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah, I'm fine with going forward with the current proposal, but as soon as we have some prices for the actual food we should amend the sponsorship tiers to include some kind of food sponsorship, display that more prominently and try to get that covered first?
We now have full board approval, but still need 2 more people from the SC to review/approve for a majority so that we can merge this and start receiving sponsorships for NixCon. Ping @roberth, @fpletz, @Gabriella439, @winterqt, @Ericson2314. |
doc/mail.md
Outdated
@@ -4,6 +4,7 @@ The `@nixos.org` email server is currently hosted on [ImprovMX](https://improvmx | |||
|
|||
ImprovMX is configured to forward emails on the following addresses to the respective users: | |||
- [email protected]: [email protected] | |||
- [email protected]: [email protected], [email protected] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is the ping for the alias?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah, the infra team should implement this change, but only once merged.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
cc @jfly
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
In addition to the SC approval, this PR now also needs an approval from the infra team though :)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm not sure an approval is necessary but they should implement it?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
See NixOS/infra#608, and the caveat in the PR message.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Approval is necessary because infra is a code owner of this file, and we require approvals from code owners before merging.
712a2db
to
acf3362
Compare
2. SC respondent ensures the SC internally rejects or provisionally approves the sponsor within 1 week. | ||
- If rejected, SC respondent replies to the sponsor with the rejection message. | ||
3. If provisionally approved by the SC, SC respondent forwards the name and website of the sponsor to the NixCon orga Matrix room for organiser approval. | ||
4. Within 1 week, the SC respondent checks whether organisers are okay with the sponsor, and if not, ensures that the SC internally reevaluates final rejection or approval of the sponsor. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What does the second part mean?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
if organizers are not OK, SC has to reevaluate and either accept that veto or ignore it (although ignoring it would be not good :))
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
In other words: The organisers have a chance to give input to the SC before a sponsor is approved. It's still the SC's final call, which can depend on how strong the disagreement is among organisers.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks! That clarifies it
As we have 5/5 board approval and 6/7 SC approval, going to merge this! Next step is to get the NixCon website live so we have a place to link sponsors to. I'll get in touch with the other respondents on synchronising for the sponsors. |
I was too slow to hit the green button, but yes I approve of this also |
Already early in NixCon 2025 planning, we organisers reached consensus to make sponsoring possible again this year, after they were forgone entirely last year. We'd like to make the tickets be as close to free as possible, considering that this years location in Switzerland is a bit more expensive to stay at. With enough funds, we could even consider extras, like meals, stipends, etc.
This PR is the next step towards making that a reality, by defining the sponsorship tiers and process. As indicated in the constitution, both the @NixOS/steering committee and the @NixOS/foundation board need to approve this.
We'd like to get this approved as soon as possible, so we can put the tiers on the NixCon website (which is being worked on) and start receiving sponsorships. This way we can get an early idea of the available budget and plan for a better event.
The tiers proposed here were initially drafted by board members and later refined with feedback from the NixCon 2025 organisers. The process was drafted by me and @Lassulus.
Ping for the NixCon 2025 organisers for visibility: @ners @Nebucatnetzer @andir @zmberber @idabzo @ForsakenHarmony @john-rodewald @a-kenji @Lassulus @pinpox @picnoir @das-g @refroni @Ra33it0 @infinisil