Skip to content

Add unit tests for MultiSearch component #1896

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jul 30, 2025

Conversation

RizWaaN3024
Copy link
Contributor

Proposed change

Resolves #[1861]

This PR adds comprehensive unit tests for the MultiSearch component to ensure robust functionality and maintainability. The test suite covers all essential testing requirements including rendering logic, user interactions, state management, and edge cases.

Key Features Added:

  • Complete test coverage for all component functionality
  • Accessibility testing with proper ARIA attributes and keyboard navigation
  • Edge case handling for empty results, missing properties, and invalid inputs
  • State management verification including highlight management and search query handling
  • Event handling tests for typing, clicking, and keyboard interactions
  • Prop-based behavior testing across different configurations
  • TypeScript improvements replacing any types with proper type annotations

Test Structure:

  • Follows established patterns from AutoScrollToTop.test.tsx
  • Proper mocking of external dependencies (router, analytics, Algolia API)
  • Comprehensive cleanup and error handling
  • 40+ test cases covering all user scenarios

Checklist Coverage:

✅ Renders successfully with minimal required props
✅ Conditional rendering logic (loading states, suggestions display)
✅ Prop-based behavior (indexes, initialValue, placeholder, eventData)
✅ Event handling (typing, clicking, keyboard navigation)
✅ State changes / internal logic (search query, highlights, suggestions)
✅ Default values and fallbacks (empty/undefined eventData)
✅ Text and content rendering (proper suggestion display)
✅ Handles edge cases and invalid inputs (empty results, missing properties)
✅ Accessibility roles and labels (ARIA attributes, focus management)
✅ DOM structure / classNames / styles (CSS class verification)

Checklist

  • I've read and followed the contributing guidelines.
  • I've run make check-test locally; all checks and tests passed.

✅ Renders successfully with minimal required props
✅ Conditional rendering logic (loading states, suggestions display)
✅ Prop-based behavior (indexes, initialValue, placeholder, eventData)
✅ Event handling (typing, clicking, keyboard navigation)
✅ State changes / internal logic (search query, highlights, suggestions)
✅ Default values and fallbacks (empty/undefined eventData)
✅ Text and content rendering (proper suggestion display)
✅ Handles edge cases and invalid inputs (empty results, missing properties)
✅ Accessibility roles and labels (ARIA attributes, focus management)
✅ DOM structure / classNames / styles (CSS class verification)

- Fix TypeScript issues by replacing 'any' types with proper annotations
- Add comprehensive test coverage following AutoScrollToTop.test.tsx structure
- Mock all external dependencies and ensure proper cleanup

Completes all Essential Test Coverage Checklist requirements.
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 28, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Tests
    • Added comprehensive unit tests for the MultiSearchBar component, covering rendering, input behavior, search functionality, suggestions display, keyboard navigation, navigation handling, edge cases, accessibility, state management, and component cleanup.

Walkthrough

A new comprehensive unit test suite for the MultiSearchBar React component has been added. This suite tests rendering, user interactions, search behavior, suggestions, navigation, accessibility, state management, and cleanup, using extensive mocking for dependencies and covering both typical and edge case scenarios.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Change Summary
MultiSearchBar Unit Tests
frontend/__tests__/unit/components/MultiSearch.test.tsx
Added a new test file with thorough unit tests for the MultiSearchBar component, covering rendering, input, search, suggestions, navigation, edge cases, accessibility, state management, and cleanup.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 3 (Moderate) | ⏱️ ~20 minutes

Possibly related issues

Possibly related PRs

  • Fix the multisearch bar #1100: This PR modifies the MultiSearchBar implementation, and the new tests in this PR are directly relevant for verifying those changes.

Suggested labels

frontend, frontend-tests

Suggested reviewers

  • arkid15r
  • kasya

Note

⚡️ Unit Test Generation is now available in beta!

Learn more here, or try it out under "Finishing Touches" below.


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 846d8e4 and 708cdaf.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • frontend/__tests__/unit/components/MultiSearch.test.tsx (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • frontend/tests/unit/components/MultiSearch.test.tsx
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (4)
  • GitHub Check: Run CI Denendencies Scan
  • GitHub Check: Run Code Scan
  • GitHub Check: CodeQL (javascript-typescript)
  • GitHub Check: CodeQL (python)
✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate unit tests to generate unit tests for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 5

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
frontend/__tests__/unit/components/MultiSearch.test.tsx (2)

158-158: Fix typo in describe block title

"Behavious" should be "Behaviour".

-  describe('Search Input Behavious', () => {
+  describe('Search Input Behaviour', () => {

643-673: Consider adding more comprehensive accessibility tests

While the current accessibility tests cover basics, consider adding tests for ARIA labels on suggestions, role attributes for the dropdown, and screen reader announcements.

it('has proper ARIA attributes for suggestions dropdown', async () => {
  const user = userEvent.setup()
  render(<MultiSearchBar {...defaultProps} />)
  
  const input = screen.getByPlaceholderText('Search...')
  await user.type(input, 'test')
  
  await waitFor(() => {
    const list = screen.getByRole('list')
    expect(list).toHaveAttribute('aria-label', expect.stringContaining('search results'))
  })
})

it('announces number of results to screen readers', async () => {
  // Test for aria-live regions or result count announcements
})
📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 8f4343c and 425087c.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • frontend/__tests__/unit/components/MultiSearch.test.tsx (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (2)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: adithya-naik
PR: OWASP/Nest#1894
File: frontend/src/components/TopContributorsList.tsx:74-74
Timestamp: 2025-07-28T14:51:14.736Z
Learning: In the OWASP/Nest project, the maintainer adithya-naik prefers not to create separate components for code that's only used in two specific cases, following the YAGNI principle to avoid over-engineering when the duplication is limited and manageable.
Learnt from: Rajgupta36
PR: OWASP/Nest#1717
File: frontend/__tests__/unit/pages/createProgram.test.tsx:70-86
Timestamp: 2025-07-12T17:36:57.255Z
Learning: When testing React page components that use mocked form components, validation logic should be tested at the form component level, not the page level. Page-level tests should focus on authentication, role checking, submission handling, and navigation logic.
frontend/__tests__/unit/components/MultiSearch.test.tsx (1)

Learnt from: Rajgupta36
PR: #1717
File: frontend/tests/unit/pages/createProgram.test.tsx:70-86
Timestamp: 2025-07-12T17:36:57.255Z
Learning: When testing React page components that use mocked form components, validation logic should be tested at the form component level, not the page level. Page-level tests should focus on authentication, role checking, submission handling, and navigation logic.

Copy link
Collaborator

@arkid15r arkid15r left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@RizWaaN3024
Copy link
Contributor Author

Could you address the bot's comments?

Sure will update.

@RizWaaN3024
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hi @kasya ,
Could you please take a look at this PR when you have a moment? Thank you!

Copy link

@kasya kasya enabled auto-merge July 30, 2025 00:53
@kasya kasya added this pull request to the merge queue Jul 30, 2025
Merged via the queue into OWASP:main with commit 20080d6 Jul 30, 2025
24 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants