Fix argument order in calculate_aicc

[dweindl]

Fix argument order in calculate_aicc. nllh was used as n_estimated and vice versa when computing AIC.

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Attention: 1 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Comparison is base (7c71053) 60.61% compared to head (683a2c1) 60.61%.

Files	Patch %	Lines
petab_select/criteria.py	0.00%	1 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##           develop      #71   +/-   ##
========================================
  Coverage    60.61%   60.61%           
========================================
  Files           14       14           
  Lines         1521     1521           
========================================
  Hits           922      922           
  Misses         599      599           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[dilpath]

AICc was computed incorrectly

Still computed correctly, since the order doesn't matter in this case, right? If so, I would rename the PR, to avoid confusion -- previous work doesn't need to be redone with this fix, since results won't change.

In any case, still an important thing, thanks a lot!

[dweindl]

Still computed correctly, since the order doesn't matter in this case, right?

You are right. Doesn't matter for AIC.

If so, I would rename the PR, to avoid confusion -- previous work doesn't need to be redone with this fix, since results won't change.

Done.