Improve Runtime by reshaping the DataAssociation #411
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This reverts commit 5ae3283.
tizianoGuadagnino
requested review from
nachovizzo and
benemer
as code owners
tizianoGuadagnino
changed the base branch from
main
to
tiziano/reduce_allocations
benemer
approved these changes
Jan 7, 2025
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Motivation
By simply switching the
Correspondencesto atbb::concurrent_vectorand performing theDataAssocationwith aparallel_forinstead of using a reduction, the pipeline's runtime decreased by 25% when I ran it in a single thread. The fantastic side effect is that the code is also much more readable.Results
Main
This PR
This is a follow-up PR from #410