Hot fix create base account

packages/backend/prisma/migrations/20260512000000_account_unique_per_chain/migration.sql

@@ -0,0 +1,87 @@
+-- Make (address, chainId) the real uniqueness key for accounts, and propagate
+-- chainId onto transactions so the foreign key targets the composite key.
+--
+-- Root cause: contract addresses derive from CREATE = keccak256(rlp(sender, nonce)),
+-- which does NOT include chainId. The same relayer wallet can therefore produce
+-- identical addresses on Horizen and Base, which violated `accounts.address @unique`
+-- and blocked multi-chain batch deployments.
+--
+-- Migration order matters: backfill transactions.chain_id BEFORE swapping
+-- constraints, otherwise the new composite FK has nothing to point at.
+--
+-- Object naming convention follows the init migration: `@@unique` and `@unique`
+-- are implemented as UNIQUE INDEXes (so DROP INDEX / CREATE UNIQUE INDEX),
+-- while explicit @relation foreign keys are real constraints
+-- (DROP CONSTRAINT / ADD CONSTRAINT FOREIGN KEY).
+
+-- 0. Pre-check: refuse to migrate if any transaction references a missing account.
+--    A NULL chain_id after backfill would block the NOT NULL step downstream.
+DO $$
+DECLARE orphan_count INTEGER;
+BEGIN
+    SELECT COUNT(*) INTO orphan_count
+    FROM transactions t
+    LEFT JOIN accounts a ON a.address = t.account_address
+    WHERE a.address IS NULL;
+
+    IF orphan_count > 0 THEN
+        RAISE EXCEPTION 'Found % orphan transactions with no matching account. Resolve manually before re-running.', orphan_count;
+    END IF;
+END $$;
+
+-- 1. Add the new column as NULLABLE so the table accepts the change without a default.
+ALTER TABLE "transactions" ADD COLUMN "chain_id" INTEGER;
+
+-- 2. Backfill from the parent account row.
+UPDATE "transactions" t
+SET "chain_id" = a."chain_id"
+FROM "accounts" a
+WHERE a."address" = t."account_address";
+
+-- 3. Promote to NOT NULL once every row has a value.
+ALTER TABLE "transactions" ALTER COLUMN "chain_id" SET NOT NULL;
+
+-- 4. Drop the old indexes / FK we're replacing.
+--    UNIQUE INDEX → DROP INDEX, FK constraint → DROP CONSTRAINT.
+ALTER TABLE "transactions" DROP CONSTRAINT "transactions_account_address_fkey";
+DROP INDEX "transactions_account_address_nonce_key";
+DROP INDEX "accounts_address_key";
+
+-- 5. Replace with composite (address, chainId) uniqueness on accounts.
+CREATE UNIQUE INDEX "accounts_address_chain_id_key"
+    ON "accounts" ("address", "chain_id");
+
+-- 6. Replace transaction-side composite unique + FK so the relation targets (address, chainId).
+CREATE UNIQUE INDEX "transactions_account_address_chain_id_nonce_key"
+    ON "transactions" ("account_address", "chain_id", "nonce");
+
+ALTER TABLE "transactions"
+    ADD CONSTRAINT "transactions_account_address_chain_id_fkey"
+    FOREIGN KEY ("account_address", "chain_id")
+    REFERENCES "accounts" ("address", "chain_id")
+    ON DELETE RESTRICT ON UPDATE CASCADE;
+
+-- 7. Swap the supporting helper index for the composite key.
+DROP INDEX IF EXISTS "transactions_account_address_idx";
+CREATE INDEX "transactions_account_address_chain_id_idx"
+    ON "transactions" ("account_address", "chain_id");
+
+-- 8. Same fix for reserved_nonces. Without chainId, two chains sharing an
+--    address would also share a nonce-reservation row and could collide.
+ALTER TABLE "reserved_nonces" ADD COLUMN "chain_id" INTEGER;
+
+UPDATE "reserved_nonces" r
+SET "chain_id" = a."chain_id"
+FROM "accounts" a
+WHERE a."address" = r."account_address";
+
+-- Any reservation pointing at an address with no matching account is stale —
+-- safe to drop, the system will recreate as needed.
+DELETE FROM "reserved_nonces" WHERE "chain_id" IS NULL;
+
+ALTER TABLE "reserved_nonces" ALTER COLUMN "chain_id" SET NOT NULL;
+
+DROP INDEX "reserved_nonces_account_address_nonce_key";
+
+CREATE UNIQUE INDEX "reserved_nonces_account_address_chain_id_nonce_key"
+    ON "reserved_nonces" ("account_address", "chain_id", "nonce");

packages/backend/prisma/schema.prisma

@@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ model User {
 
 model Account {
   id              String          @id @default(cuid())
-  address         String          @unique
+  address         String
   name            String
   threshold       Int
   chainId         Int             @default(26514) @map("chain_id")
@@ -37,6 +37,11 @@ model Account {
   contacts        Contact[]
   transactions    Transaction[]
 
+  // Contract addresses derive from (relayer, nonce) without including chainId,
+  // so the same wallet can produce identical addresses on different chains
+  // (Horizen vs Base) when nonces align. The pair (address, chainId) is the
+  // real uniqueness key for a deployed multisig.
+  @@unique([address, chainId])
   @@map("accounts")
 }
 
@@ -64,6 +69,7 @@ model Transaction {
   value          String?
   tokenAddress   String?   @map("token_address")
   accountAddress String    @map("account_address")
+  chainId        Int       @map("chain_id")
   contactId      String?   @map("contact_id")
   signerData     String?   @map("signer_data")
   newThreshold   Int?      @map("new_threshold")
@@ -74,25 +80,26 @@ model Transaction {
   executedAt     DateTime? @map("executed_at")
   createdAt      DateTime  @default(now()) @map("created_at")
   updatedAt      DateTime  @updatedAt @map("updated_at")
-  account        Account   @relation(fields: [accountAddress], references: [address])
+  account        Account   @relation(fields: [accountAddress, chainId], references: [address, chainId])
   contact        Contact?  @relation(fields: [contactId], references: [id])
   votes          Vote[]
 
-  @@unique([accountAddress, nonce])
+  @@unique([accountAddress, chainId, nonce])
   @@index([status])
-  @@index([accountAddress])
+  @@index([accountAddress, chainId])
   @@index([contactId])
   @@map("transactions")
 }
 
 model ReservedNonce {
   id             String   @id @default(cuid())
   accountAddress String   @map("account_address")
+  chainId        Int      @map("chain_id")
   nonce          Int
   expiresAt      DateTime @map("expires_at")
   createdAt      DateTime @default(now()) @map("created_at")
 
-  @@unique([accountAddress, nonce])
+  @@unique([accountAddress, chainId, nonce])
   @@map("reserved_nonces")
 }
 

packages/backend/src/account/account.controller.ts

@@ -7,12 +7,14 @@ import {
   ApiBearerAuth,
 } from '@nestjs/swagger';
 import {
+  BadRequestException,
   Controller,
   Get,
   Post,
   Body,
   Param,
   Patch,
+  Query,
   UseGuards,
 } from '@nestjs/common';
 import {
@@ -128,8 +130,12 @@ export class AccountController {
     description: 'Forbidden - Not an account signer',
   })
   @ApiResponse({ status: 404, description: 'Account not found' })
-  async findByAddress(@Param('address') address: string) {
-    return this.accountService.findByAddress(address);
+  async findByAddress(
+    @Param('address') address: string,
+    @Query('chainId') chainIdRaw: string,
+  ) {
+    const chainId = parseChainIdQuery(chainIdRaw);
+    return this.accountService.findByAddress(address, chainId);
   }
 
   /**
@@ -170,8 +176,22 @@ export class AccountController {
   @ApiResponse({ status: 404, description: 'Account not found' })
   async update(
     @Param('address') address: string,
+    @Query('chainId') chainIdRaw: string,
     @Body() dto: UpdateAccountDto,
   ) {
-    return this.accountService.update(address, dto);
+    const chainId = parseChainIdQuery(chainIdRaw);
+    return this.accountService.update(address, chainId, dto);
+  }
+}
+
+// (address, chainId) is the real account key; refuse requests that omit it
+// rather than silently picking the first match.
+function parseChainIdQuery(value: string | undefined): number {
+  const chainId = Number.parseInt(value ?? '', 10);
+  if (!Number.isFinite(chainId) || chainId <= 0) {
+    throw new BadRequestException(
+      'chainId query parameter is required (e.g. ?chainId=8453)',
+    );
   }
+  return chainId;
 }

packages/backend/src/account/account.service.ts

@@ -148,7 +148,7 @@ export class AccountService {
       );
     }
 
-    return this.findByAddress(address);
+    return this.findByAddress(address, dto.chainId);
   }
 
   async createBatch(
@@ -309,11 +309,15 @@ export class AccountService {
   }
 
   /**
-   * Get multisig account by address with signers
+   * Get multisig account by (address, chainId) — the composite uniqueness key.
+   * The same address can exist on multiple chains (Horizen vs Base) when
+   * relayer nonces align, so chainId is mandatory to disambiguate.
    */
-  async findByAddress(address: string) {
+  async findByAddress(address: string, chainId: number) {
     const account = await this.prisma.account.findUnique({
-      where: { address },
+      where: {
+        address_chainId: { address, chainId },
+      },
       include: {
         signers: {
           include: {
@@ -383,22 +387,24 @@ export class AccountService {
   /**
    * Update multisig account by address
    */
-  async update(address: string, dto: UpdateAccountDto) {
+  async update(address: string, chainId: number, dto: UpdateAccountDto) {
     const account = await this.prisma.account.findUnique({
-      where: { address },
+      where: {
+        address_chainId: { address, chainId },
+      },
     });
 
     if (!account) {
       throw new NotFoundException('Account not found');
     }
 
     await this.prisma.account.update({
-      where: { address },
+      where: { id: account.id },
       data: {
         name: dto.name,
       },
     });
 
-    return this.findByAddress(address);
+    return this.findByAddress(address, chainId);
   }
 }

packages/backend/src/app.module.ts

@@ -24,6 +24,7 @@ import { AdminModule } from './admin/admin.module';
 import { BalanceAlertModule } from './balance-alert/balance-alert.module';
 import { ScheduleModule } from '@nestjs/schedule';
 import { X402Module } from './x402/x402.module';
+import { LlmsTxtModule } from './llms-txt/llms-txt.module';
 
 const featureX402 = process.env.FEATURE_X402_DEPOSIT === 'true';
 
@@ -53,6 +54,7 @@ const featureX402 = process.env.FEATURE_X402_DEPOSIT === 'true';
     BalanceAlertModule,
     ScheduleModule.forRoot(),
     ...(featureX402 ? [X402Module] : []),
+    LlmsTxtModule,
   ],
 })
 export class AppModule implements NestModule {

packages/backend/src/auth/guards/account-member.guard.ts

@@ -1,8 +1,9 @@
 import {
-  Injectable,
+  BadRequestException,
   CanActivate,
   ExecutionContext,
   ForbiddenException,
+  Injectable,
 } from '@nestjs/common';
 import { PrismaService } from '@/database/prisma.service';
 import { NOT_MEMBER_OF_ACCOUNT } from '@/common/constants';
@@ -15,6 +16,7 @@ export class AccountMemberGuard implements CanActivate {
     const request = context.switchToHttp().getRequest();
     const userCommitment = request.user?.commitment;
     const accountAddress = request.params?.address;
+    const chainIdRaw = request.query?.chainId;
 
     if (!userCommitment) {
       throw new ForbiddenException('User not authenticated');
@@ -24,10 +26,21 @@ export class AccountMemberGuard implements CanActivate {
       throw new ForbiddenException('Account address not provided');
     }
 
-    // Check if user is a member of the wallet
+    // chainId is mandatory: the same address can exist on multiple chains
+    // (same relayer + same nonce on Horizen vs Base). Without scoping the
+    // lookup by chainId, a signer of one account could trick the guard into
+    // letting them act on a different account that happens to share its
+    // address.
+    const chainId = Number.parseInt(String(chainIdRaw ?? ''), 10);
+    if (!Number.isFinite(chainId) || chainId <= 0) {
+      throw new BadRequestException(
+        'chainId query parameter is required (e.g. ?chainId=8453)',
+      );
+    }
+
     const membership = await this.prisma.accountSigner.findFirst({
       where: {
-        account: { address: accountAddress },
+        account: { address: accountAddress, chainId },
         user: { commitment: userCommitment },
       },
     });

packages/backend/src/auth/guards/transaction-access.guard.ts

@@ -1,8 +1,8 @@
 import {
-  Injectable,
   CanActivate,
   ExecutionContext,
   ForbiddenException,
+  Injectable,
   NotFoundException,
 } from '@nestjs/common';
 import { PrismaService } from '@/database/prisma.service';
@@ -25,20 +25,24 @@ export class TransactionAccessGuard implements CanActivate {
       throw new ForbiddenException('Transaction ID not provided');
     }
 
-    // Find transaction and its wallet
     const transaction = await this.prisma.transaction.findUnique({
       where: { txId },
-      include: { account: true },
+      select: { accountAddress: true, chainId: true },
     });
 
     if (!transaction) {
       throw new NotFoundException('Transaction not found');
     }
 
-    // Check if user is a member of the wallet
+    // Scope membership by both address AND chainId — the same address can
+    // live on multiple chains, and only the signer of the exact multisig
+    // (this transaction's chain) should be allowed access.
     const membership = await this.prisma.accountSigner.findFirst({
       where: {
-        account: { address: transaction.account.address },
+        account: {
+          address: transaction.accountAddress,
+          chainId: transaction.chainId,
+        },
         user: { commitment: userCommitment },
       },
     });

packages/backend/src/common/utils/membership.ts

@@ -4,19 +4,26 @@ import { NOT_MEMBER_OF_ACCOUNT } from '@/common/constants';
 
 /**
  * Check if user is a signer of the account. Throws ForbiddenException if not.
- * @param prisma - PrismaService instance
- * @param accountLookup - Either { accountId } or { accountAddress } to identify the account
- * @param userCommitment - User's commitment string
+ *
+ * Account lookup MUST be precise: either `accountId` (a CUID) or the composite
+ * `{ accountAddress, chainId }`. Using address alone is unsafe — the same
+ * address can exist on multiple chains, so an address-only check could match
+ * a signer of a different multisig that happens to share the address.
  */
 export async function checkAccountMembership(
   prisma: PrismaService,
-  accountLookup: { accountId: string } | { accountAddress: string },
+  accountLookup:
+    | { accountId: string }
+    | { accountAddress: string; chainId: number },
   userCommitment: string,
 ): Promise<void> {
   const accountWhere =
     'accountId' in accountLookup
       ? { id: accountLookup.accountId }
-      : { address: accountLookup.accountAddress };
+      : {
+          address: accountLookup.accountAddress,
+          chainId: accountLookup.chainId,
+        };
 
   const membership = await prisma.accountSigner.findFirst({
     where: {