-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 63
Bump dependency compat and try using TO on newer CUDA/cuTENSOR #223
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
Test = "1" | ||
TupleTools = "1.6" | ||
VectorInterface = "0.4.1,0.5" | ||
cuTENSOR = "2.1.1" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I know it doesn't matter too much for this PR, but I think this minimal version was really required, mostly because we are relying on this PR : JuliaGPU/CUDA.jl#2356
That makes sense. I created this mostly as a test to see if this would
instantly break everything. Where is it that we’re relying on this specific
version? Is it in a downstream package?
…On Thu, Sep 4, 2025 at 12:56 PM Lukas Devos ***@***.***> wrote:
***@***.**** commented on this pull request.
------------------------------
In Project.toml
<#223 (comment)>
:
> @@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ StridedViews = "0.3, 0.4"
Test = "1"
TupleTools = "1.6"
VectorInterface = "0.4.1,0.5"
-cuTENSOR = "2.1.1"
I know it doesn't matter too much for this PR, but I think this minimal
version was really required, mostly because we are relying on this PR :
JuliaGPU/CUDA.jl#2356 <JuliaGPU/CUDA.jl#2356>
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#223 (review)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAGKJY4TEDGVSTZRKYNGFXL3RALETAVCNFSM6AAAAACFTNUF2KVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43YUDVNRWFEZLROVSXG5CSMV3GSZLXHMZTCOBUGU4DIMBTGE>
.
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
No, the cuTENSOR.jl wrappers were restricted to |
Ah ok I see, I'll restore the minimum version then |
This actually failed for me locally which is interesting/concerning. It would be great to support newer cuTENSOR and
CUDA.jl
as a lot of updates have happened there.