Skip to content

Conversation

kshyatt
Copy link
Member

@kshyatt kshyatt commented Sep 4, 2025

This actually failed for me locally which is interesting/concerning. It would be great to support newer cuTENSOR and CUDA.jl as a lot of updates have happened there.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 4, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
see 1 file with indirect coverage changes

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Test = "1"
TupleTools = "1.6"
VectorInterface = "0.4.1,0.5"
cuTENSOR = "2.1.1"
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I know it doesn't matter too much for this PR, but I think this minimal version was really required, mostly because we are relying on this PR : JuliaGPU/CUDA.jl#2356

@kshyatt
Copy link
Member Author

kshyatt commented Sep 4, 2025 via email

@lkdvos
Copy link
Member

lkdvos commented Sep 4, 2025

No, the cuTENSOR.jl wrappers were restricted to DenseCuArray types before the PR I linked, and we are wrapping everything in CuStridedView = StridedView{<:CuArray}, which is not a subtype of that unfortunately.

@kshyatt
Copy link
Member Author

kshyatt commented Sep 4, 2025

Ah ok I see, I'll restore the minimum version then

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants