-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13
Always insert spaces into search bar #60
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #60 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 79.50% 79.50%
=======================================
Files 23 23
Lines 2561 2561
=======================================
Hits 2036 2036
Misses 525 525 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
I think this is ok. Space is always a bit of a weird key.
that's a bit awkward, but as it shouldn't generally change search results if search later happens, I think it's ok?
That's a really good point. If you want to take a stab at that, feel free :) |
OpenQA test summaryComplete test suite and dependencies: https://openqa.qubes-os.org/tests/overview?distri=qubesos&version=4.3&build=2025071515-4.3&flavor=pull-requests Test run included the following:
New failures, excluding unstableCompared to: https://openqa.qubes-os.org/tests/overview?distri=qubesos&version=4.3&build=2025061004-4.3&flavor=update
Failed tests10 failures
Fixed failuresCompared to: https://openqa.qubes-os.org/tests/142375#dependencies 10 fixed
Unstable testsPerformance TestsPerformance degradation:7 performance degradations
Remaining performance tests:65 tests
|
Fixes QubesOS/qubes-issues#8789. Follow up to #47, cc @marmarta. This combines elements of different versions of that PR.
Alternative: could let a focused search bar insert the space itself by wrapping all of this in in the previously present
Developed and tested on top of branch
release4.2
.Tested scenarios from previous PR:
Still weird:
_key_press
and_key_pressed
methods appear to handle the same events. Combining them would make it easier to address the previous point.