Move pragma ahead #2231
Merged
Move pragma ahead #2231
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
xw285cornell
requested review from
illsilin,
carlushuang,
qianfengz,
aosewski,
poyenc,
geyyer,
bartekxk,
andriy-ca,
afagaj,
asleepzzz,
tenpercent,
ThomasNing and
coderfeli
as code owners
jeffdaily
approved these changes
May 27, 2025
|
Looks good. pragma at the top make sense. |
AviralGoelAMD
approved these changes
May 28, 2025
|
Launched the CI |
geyyer
approved these changes
May 28, 2025
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Proposed changes
Running into a multi-definition error. It looks pragma once needs to be at the top of the file, otherwise just run into weird issues.