Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Aug 3, 2026. It is now read-only.

[submit] a4e35b79c9b2 — val by hotkey 5DkeUCZNYrcG… - #1577

Open
HadesHappy wants to merge 1 commit into
RalphLabsAI:mainfrom
HadesHappy:submit/a4e35b79c9b2
Open

[submit] a4e35b79c9b2 — val by hotkey 5DkeUCZNYrcG…#1577
HadesHappy wants to merge 1 commit into
RalphLabsAI:mainfrom
HadesHappy:submit/a4e35b79c9b2

Conversation

@HadesHappy

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

v25: independent reproduction of king #1754's published recipe on clean canonical data

This is a verification run, not a crown attempt. King #1754 (bundle 6ec294cb,
miner star-dust9023) was crowned at val_bpb 1.0234 with a public, canonical-
architecture recipe: muon_lr 0.04, embed_lr 0.009, beta2 0.95, warmup 700,
WSD 0.55/0.45 with 1-sqrt decay, 5050 steps at batch 1024, determinism off.

We reproduced that configuration exactly — same steps, batch, schedule, seeds
(42/42), and learning rates — on the canonical FineWeb-Edu corpus, and added
our own previously-crowned improvements on top (z-loss, epoch-permutation
sampler, Muon momentum warmup), so this run should score at or better than a
faithful replica of #1754's recipe.

Local evaluation of the resulting checkpoint lands ~0.014 worse than our own
v23 lineage and roughly 0.05 worse than #1754's claimed score. If this
submission's hidden-eval confirms that gap, the published recipe cannot be the
source of #1754's val_bpb, and the remaining explanation is training-time
contamination of the held-out evaluation data (the class ralph PR #101's op4b
difference-in-differences gate is designed to catch, currently unmerged). We
submit this bundle to put an attested, validator-scored reproduction on the
public record.


Submission identifiers

bundle_hash: a4e35b79c9b2e7b091373d9190603035a3fe48bfecb0bf0cee84029f6a626890
miner_hotkey: 5DkeUCZNYrcGneX7wJDUqYxENX7CicSbzFhnbwhpyyDqYok6
miner_github: @HadesHappy
signature: e0b6a7f5c3523a6c0421308d26d591a2…

Submitted via scripts/miner_run.py. The validator will compare
this PR's diff against the bundle's patch.diff byte-for-byte.

# v25: independent reproduction of king #1754's published recipe on clean canonical data

This is a verification run, not a crown attempt. King #1754 (bundle 6ec294cb,
miner star-dust9023) was crowned at val_bpb 1.0234 with a public, canonical-
architecture recipe: muon_lr 0.04, embed_lr 0.009, beta2 0.95, warmup 700,
WSD 0.55/0.45 with 1-sqrt decay, 5050 steps at batch 1024, determinism off.

We reproduced that configuration exactly — same steps, batch, schedule, seeds
(42/42), and learning rates — on the canonical FineWeb-Edu corpus, and added
our own previously-crowned improvements on top (z-loss, epoch-permutation
sampler, Muon momentum warmup), so this run should score at or better than a
faithful replica of #1754's recipe.

Local evaluation of the resulting checkpoint lands ~0.014 worse than our own
v23 lineage and roughly 0.05 worse than #1754's claimed score. If this
submission's hidden-eval confirms that gap, the published recipe cannot be the
source of #1754's val_bpb, and the remaining explanation is training-time
contamination of the held-out evaluation data (the class ralph PR RalphLabsAI#101's op4b
difference-in-differences gate is designed to catch, currently unmerged). We
submit this bundle to put an attested, validator-scored reproduction on the
public record.

---

## Submission identifiers

**bundle_hash:** `a4e35b79c9b2e7b091373d9190603035a3fe48bfecb0bf0cee84029f6a626890`
**miner_hotkey:** `5DkeUCZNYrcGneX7wJDUqYxENX7CicSbzFhnbwhpyyDqYok6`
**miner_github:** @HadesHappy
**signature:** `e0b6a7f5c3523a6c0421308d26d591a2…`

Submitted via `scripts/miner_run.py`. The validator will compare
this PR's diff against the bundle's `patch.diff` byte-for-byte.
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant