replace temporary objects with subscript operator

[badasahog]

Temporary objects are unnecessary, especially when derived from a const pointer.

I think this creates an improvement in readability, as the code becomes more self documenting.

I would also add that potentially we should make the pointer idxp a restrict qualification (if safe) and a more descript name.

I don't know exactly what it's for tho, so I'm useless there.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 98.79%. Comparing base (1320863) to head (fbcf862).

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #7238      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   98.79%   98.79%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files          81       81              
  Lines       15254    15247       -7     
==========================================
- Hits        15070    15063       -7     
  Misses        184      184              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[github-actions]

No obvious timing issues in HEAD=replaceWithSubscript

Generated via commit fbcf862

Download link for the artifact containing the test results: ↓ atime-results.zip

Task	Duration
R setup and installing dependencies	2 minutes and 53 seconds
Installing different package versions	40 seconds
Running and plotting the test cases	2 minutes and 36 seconds

[MichaelChirico]

this one in particular looks useful as a local variable, rather than reading idxp[i] 6 more times.

Is there an advantage of idxp[i] over just adding const here?

[badasahog]

idxp is already a pointer to const, so idxp[i] would likely be held in a register.

[jangorecki]

"Likely" may not be best reason for change that doesn't really do much. If it is more readable is also questionable... x[y[i]] IMO is less readable than x[yi]

[MichaelChirico]

I think this creates an improvement in readability, as the code becomes more self documenting.

I'm not sure about this, could you elaborate? Any external reference you can point to?

[badasahog]

It's more obvious where the data comes from, instead of adding a temporary object which adds another level of unnecessary abstraction.